For those who had noticed, there's actually no way that Castlevania Dracula is the same character described in Bram Stoker's novel yet it's in the Castlevania timeline which actually makes no sense at all.
Especially they're two completely different characters which first of all.
Dracula from the novel got his vampirism from Black Magic and Alchemy from the Scholomance, not what was described in "Lament of Innocence" nor did book Dracula had a wife named "Elizabetha" either which was a Francis Cord Coppla invention.
Also Dracula from the novel is clad in all black and he looks nothing like how we imagine Dracula looking like today. For example Novel Dracula has hairy clawed hands, has blue eyes and his eyes glow inferno red when pissed off or engaging in vampirism, Dracula never wears a cape either and he grows younger when he drinks Blood of course and he has black hair and a black mustache.
Also Novel Dracula's main goal is to take over England/London and dominate the world and ruling humanity like cattle whilst Castlevania's Dracula wants to exterminate humanity into extinction over the death of his wife which albet sounds very irrational that is compared to Novel Dracula's.
So yeah, Novel Dracula and Castlevania Dracula are obviously two completely different characters and I've been wondering if the two met and who would win....