i based my assumption on the fact that no one talks about him. If people play games they talk about it. Hate or love.
Or rather because most of the "fans" here are just in truth fans of the IGA-style Castlevanias starting with Symphony of the Night. That's why no one here talks about them much, because they haven't played the game. Luckily for me, I've finished both Castlevania: The Adventure and Castlevania II: Belmont's Revenge.
I for one am hoping for IGA to remake Christopher Belmont's story. Oh and another thing, IGA did mention or did have a little reference to Chrisptopher Belmont, just not in PoR. It was in Harmony of Dissonance, where there's a certain whip enhancement called "Bullet Soul" (which in Japanese was "Christopher's Soul") which takes a nod at Christopher's Vampire Killer whip enhancement; fireballs shoot out of the whip when Juste's HP is full.
Indeed Christopher is one of the unsung Belmont heroes and his legend is one of the least talked about in the series. He's one of the few Belmonts to have fought Dracula twice in their lifetime (like his descendant Simon Belmont). He was the first Belmont in the official canon, not to have used any subweapons when he first faced Dracula (thus Dracula wasn't fully destroyed and was able to escape to wait for his chance at vengeance after 15 years). And he was also the only Belmont to face his own son/blood in battle; the ONLY Belmont VS Belmont battle in the historical canon of Castlevania. For me, his story is one of the most memorable stories in Castlevania history and is worth looking into. In my opinion, his story led to the development of IGA's current ideas like:
- Players facing off a Belmont in battle. (like in SotN, AoS and PoR)
- Belmonts being suseptible to corruption (like in Richter's case)
For me, it deserves a retelling/remake because people aren't exposed to the past Castlevania heroes before IGA's time. His legend is worth being part of the Castlevania: Chronicle remakes in my opinion.