Castlevania Dungeon Forums
The Castlevania Dungeon Forums => General Castlevania Discussion => Topic started by: danceofgold on March 08, 2011, 01:29:24 AM
-
I thought of making a poll after reading the argument in the 'This is how Castlevania Judgment should have been' thread. Under normal circumstances, who do you think is the stronger one?
In SotN, Alucard didn't exactly beat Richter; he freed him from Shaft's control.
In the radio drama, Richter was the one who dealt the critical blow to Magnus, releasing Alucard from his spell.
However, there's a possibility that Alucard is (as his father says) weakened by his human side, and could be stronger if he's evil.
-
Since losing to Trevor in CVIII Alucard has been mostly napping while the Belmont clan has been growing stronger with every battle
I suppose they could easily be equally matched but my vote is with Richter.
-
Since losing to Trevor in CVIII Alucard has been mostly napping while the Belmont clan has been growing stronger with every battle
I suppose they could easily be equally matched but my vote is with Richter.
The Belmont's won against Alucard before his awakening in sotn..but obiviously Alucard turned out to be much stronger in sotn, so juding from the latest timeline Alucard remains the strongest.
The recollection story was more like a mental manipulation against Alucard to convert him to evil, in which Richter sccessfully broke the spell. no real analyisis can be found here really=p
-
Why those two? Why? again?
-
Who cares? Who really cares why those two, and why again? Because my vote made it 40, 30, 20, 10!
Sweet!@
-
hey guys
Who is stronger? Hector or Trevor?
-
Alucard is indeed strong and probably the strongest non-Belmont (next to Soma) however most if not all of Alucard's power comes from either Dracula or the castle and Belmont beats both of those.
-
In a battle? Richter. In a bench pressing contest? Alucard. The Belmonts were normally only in their late teens/early twenties when they defeated Dracula and Alucard. Dracula and Alucard were hundreds of years old. Even with their powers and experience they were unable to best the Belmonts.
-
Who is stronger? Hector or Trevor?
I my mind Hector doesn't exist so I'd say Trevor. But I voted for the non-possessed Richter. He's far stronger then Trevor ever was and I still think Alucard would lose to him.
-X
-
Easily Trevor. Hector was only able to defeat Dracula because for some reason Dracula's own power works well against him.
-
Who is stronger? Hector or Trevor?
I my mind Hector doesn't exist so I'd say Trevor. But I voted for the non-possessed Richter. He's far stronger then Trevor ever was and I still think Alucard would lose to him.
-X
Ha! I feel the same way about Hector. Dracula and Death needing people to create monsters for them!? Just another reason why I can't stand Iga. In my mind, Curse of Darkness doesn't exist. However, if it did, Trevor would break both Hector and Isaac at the same time.
-
Richter all the way! In fact I made a youtube video giving off the reasons why I thought Richter Belmont is the man!!!
-
Alucard. I always thought that Richter must have been pretty weak to get possessed by Shaft.
-
Richter vs. Alucard....
tough call. I really can't say. the vampire killer may give Richter a bit of an advantage. then again, all Alucard has to do is turn into poison mist and surround Richter. It really depends on their condition. Are they at full strength, or have they been fighting others beforehand without resting? If they are tired, it comes down to an endurance match in which I believe Alucard would have an advantage.
It really could go either way. It all depends on their condition and what tactics they use.
-
/facepalm
Seriously?
-
depends on which character is being controlled by the player and how good the player is
heh
-
I suspect very VERY strongly that any such fight would have a dramatic resolution rather than a clear winner. It would almost certainly revolve around some dramatic point of the storyline.
-
depends on which character is being controlled by the player and how good the player is
heh
LOL I knew someone was gonna say that.
-
Well, Ritcher is considerably more manly, which therefore means his johnson is much larger. Richter by default then.
-
I voted Richter but if we are going by johnson size then Alucard wins. His voice is so deep that his basketballs must be kept in his boot
-
I voted Richter but if we are going by johnson size then Alucard wins. His voice is so deep that his basketballs must be kept in his boot
Except he's androgynous so he's either got a really small pair or he doesn't have any at all :-X
-X
-
All the manliness went into his vocal cords and nothing else.
-
Not to mention we could be talking about DXC Alucard as well. He doesn't have much of a manly voice in that game.
-
I voted Richter but if we are going by johnson size then Alucard wins. His voice is so deep that his basketballs must be kept in his boot
Well, according to the replies below your response, Alucard does indeed have a small penis. So IN YOUR FACE.....with Alucard's tiny penis.