Castlevania Dungeon Forums

The Castlevania Dungeon Forums => Hardcore Gaming 101 => Topic started by: Gecko on May 14, 2012, 08:35:04 AM

Title: Diablo III
Post by: Gecko on May 14, 2012, 08:35:04 AM
Anybody else excited?

I've been playing Diablo games since the original I was 7. 3 comes out tomorrow, and I am PUMPED! I'm going to start by playing as a monk character. My Battletag is BluLeviathan#1716.
Title: Re: Diablo III
Post by: Aridale on May 14, 2012, 08:53:28 AM
Im goin to the midnight release tonight! woooooo!
Title: Re: Diablo III
Post by: TheouAegis on May 14, 2012, 09:02:25 AM
I probably need a new computer first. Ghostbusters plays sooo slowly on my computer and that game is years older.
Title: Re: Diablo III
Post by: Aridale on May 14, 2012, 11:16:20 AM
it prolly wont be that big of an issue with d3 blizzard makes very scalable engines. WoW could prolly run on a toaster if they wanted it to
Title: Re: Diablo III
Post by: GuyStarwind on May 14, 2012, 12:23:54 PM
I'm sure I'll get it at some point but I'm trying to save money to move.
Title: Re: Diablo III
Post by: TheouAegis on May 14, 2012, 05:48:58 PM
My first computer only had 256k RAM and I couldn't play Diablo II. Then I upgraded the ram to 512k and it worked, but by then all my Diablo II buddies were gone, having graduated before me and moved on.

I know my laptop can play WoW, but my desktop plays it only slightly better. So i'm not too sure. I might buy it and try it out, but what's the fun of playing with dumbed down graphics?
Title: Re: Diablo III
Post by: Kale on May 14, 2012, 06:24:08 PM
Nope.... getting Torchlight 2 myself.
Title: Re: Diablo III
Post by: Abnormal Freak on May 15, 2012, 02:33:21 AM
I'm not terribly excited for the game myself. While I loved the first two—especially the first—I can't bring myself to get excited for something that isn't even being made by the same people. Seems like, creatively, Blizzard now consists of...none of the people who made them so great.

And much like how it just isn't Silent Hill without Akira Yamaoka, it just isn't Diablo without Matt Uelmen.

Diablo - Dungeon (music) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12Q-r7zV4EM#)

Eventually when I get my own computer, I'm sure I'll pick up Diablo III on the cheap.
Title: Re: Diablo III
Post by: Gecko on May 15, 2012, 05:24:43 AM
I'm not terribly excited for the game myself. While I loved the first two—especially the first—I can't bring myself to get excited for something that isn't even being made by the same people. Seems like, creatively, Blizzard now consists of...none of the people who made them so great.

And much like how it just isn't Silent Hill without Akira Yamaoka, it just isn't Diablo without Matt Uelmen.

Diablo - Dungeon (music) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12Q-r7zV4EM#)

Eventually when I get my own computer, I'm sure I'll pick up Diablo III on the cheap.

Yeah, I'm admittedly a little put off by that too. I'm picking my copy up today though. Oh, and that music just brings back so many great memories! I woke up with the Tristram song stuck in my head.

From what I gather from Facebook, servers were unable to handle the game last night. I'm not surprised. That's one reason I didn't bother to get it on midnight release.  Seriously, why does SINGLE PLAYER have to be connected to the internet? Yeah, I know they have the "Auction House" which I may or may not use. There should at least be the OPTION to play without internet, even if it takes away from some of the features. Oh well. Hopefully everything will be functional around 9:30 today when I give the game a whirl.
Title: Re: Diablo III
Post by: Gunlord on May 15, 2012, 06:11:01 AM
If my IRL friend is playing it right now, I probably will too. if not, though...~_~
Title: Re: Diablo III
Post by: Aridale on May 15, 2012, 08:14:30 AM
the servers didnt even come up til 2am my time and they were SLAMMED. I sat there for 30min tryin to login and all I saw was "server is busy" over and over then 1 outta 20 or so tries Id get to authenticate and itd time out. I got to char creation once and as soon as I submitted my name it timed out again and I had to start over with the loggin in.

At 230 I said fuck it and went to sleep. I expected more from Blizzard with their past record. It wasnt that hard to log into WoW after Cataclysm launched...

I did get to play finally for about 30min this mornin before work. Not a huge deal tho since I was in the beta but still its gonna be a long day waitin to get home to play lol
Title: Re: Diablo III
Post by: KaZudra on May 15, 2012, 09:50:19 AM
DRM is the reason most people would probably just pirate the game, at least they'll have the freedom to play without DRM
Title: Re: Diablo III
Post by: Gecko on May 15, 2012, 11:04:35 AM
I've been playing a little over an hour now, and I got kicked out of my own game because they're performing server maintenence.

Requiring connection to battle.net servers is just silly. They should have a separate battle.not options meni, since the auction house isn't even available mid-game. Ugh. Oh well. It's cool to see Deckard Cain again. The old tristram ruins kind of aren't shaped like old Tristram, but whatevz. So far from what I've played it's pretty neat.
Title: Re: Diablo III
Post by: Abnormal Freak on May 15, 2012, 12:37:53 PM
DRM can suck my fat, sweaty nads. It punishes those who actually pay for the game, and pirates will pirate it anyway.

I couldn't play Duke Nukem Forever a few weeks back because Steam told me the game was currently unavailable. I bought the fecking game and should be allowed to play it whenever I want...
Title: Re: Diablo III
Post by: Gecko on May 15, 2012, 02:54:36 PM
AHH the server is STILL.. NOT... BACK.  :'(
Title: Re: Diablo III
Post by: Gunlord on May 15, 2012, 03:10:51 PM
They're already comparing Diablo 3 to "Tortanic" (a reference to Bioware's The Old Republic, which they say was a disaster comparable to the Titanic in videogame terms) over on /v/. While I wouldn't go that far, I will say that this sort of thing is profoundly, PROFOUNDLY unprofessional and might likely hurt Blizz in the future. They said the connection problems in the beta "would not be representative of the final product." Well, it seems beta problems are what we've gotten. Who's going to trust Blizz now? Even a sterling reputation like Blizzard's can be pissed away very easily. And though d3 may be the bestselling preorder game of all time, after this experience whatever blizz's next game may be could end up being the worst. :p
Title: Re: Diablo III
Post by: Kale on May 15, 2012, 05:53:36 PM
There are plenty of loyal fanboys who will still fight for blizzard regardless.

Quality wise, it doesn't seem to be disappointing from what I saw in the beta. Still don't like most of their recent decisions though. Online DRM, Skill changes, UI, Stats (both of them), and now.... it's supposed length? While I don't know if it's true... I heard someone say it's already beaten? and that was like 8 hours ago. That doesn't seem long at all.
Title: Re: Diablo III
Post by: Gunlord on May 15, 2012, 07:03:30 PM
To be fair, its possible to beat Dark Souls in 2 hours as well (there are speedruns on Utube).
Title: Re: Diablo III
Post by: Gecko on May 15, 2012, 08:46:28 PM
Finally got to play for about 4 hours before getting booted by failing servers again. Oh well. Fun game so far. ...when Blizzard lets me play it.
Title: Re: Diablo III
Post by: Gunlord on May 15, 2012, 09:17:32 PM
It's ridiculous, from what I hear. Someone really ought to get canned for this debacle. I see heads rolling pretty soon...
Title: Re: Diablo III
Post by: Nail_Bombed on May 16, 2012, 01:11:53 AM
Nope.avi Always on DRM is not needed for this type of game IMO.

Will be sticking to Torchlight 2 and Grim Dawn.... and may well get Path Of Exile. That'll fill the Diablo shaped hole in my click-click-click life.
Title: Re: Diablo III
Post by: TheouAegis on May 16, 2012, 08:10:43 AM
*Blizzard shuts down Diablo 3 server*

*$40 fizzles*

*rage*
Title: Re: Diablo III
Post by: Aridale on May 16, 2012, 08:23:01 AM
yeah judgin by my play time per class this mornin when I could actually log in Ive got about an hour and 10 min played since it launched... its either been down or Ive been workin the rest of the time
Title: Re: Diablo III
Post by: Gecko on May 16, 2012, 09:55:28 AM
There are plenty of loyal fanboys who will still fight for blizzard regardless.

Quality wise, it doesn't seem to be disappointing from what I saw in the beta. Still don't like most of their recent decisions though. Online DRM, Skill changes, UI, Stats (both of them), and now.... it's supposed length? While I don't know if it's true... I heard someone say it's already beaten? and that was like 8 hours ago. That doesn't seem long at all.

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/Diablo-Blizzard-PC-Gaming-7-hours-Korea,15649.html (http://www.tomshardware.com/news/Diablo-Blizzard-PC-Gaming-7-hours-Korea,15649.html)

Yeah, but only by Asians who were most likely speedrunning it. I've got about 6 hours in the game so far, and I'm still in act 1 of 4. Granted, I like to stop and smell the roses in these games, because I don't like charging beginning to end without enjoying myself on the way there.  :-\ It's taking me longer to finish Act 1 in Diablo 3 than it does to do Act 1 in Diablo 2, if that means anything. Quality-wise, it's a really fun game. Hopefully soon they'll fix all the server issues so I can play longer individual sittings.
Title: Re: Diablo III
Post by: Kale on May 16, 2012, 02:18:03 PM
That's good. I don't like charging through either.

Still has a lot of things i dislike, so I'm gonna wait on this game.
Title: Re: Diablo III
Post by: VladCT on May 19, 2012, 10:57:42 PM
Relevant:
http://www.cracked.com/blog/5-reasons-diablo-iii-represents-gamings-annoying-future/ (http://www.cracked.com/blog/5-reasons-diablo-iii-represents-gamings-annoying-future/)
Title: Re: Diablo III
Post by: Kale on May 22, 2012, 09:44:17 PM
Just beat it at a friend's house. Sort of rushed through it... It was fun. Towards the end of Act 3 I started getting bored though. And Act 4 was pretty disappointing.