Castlevania Dungeon Forums

The Castlevania Dungeon Forums => General Castlevania Discussion => Topic started by: Nagumo on August 03, 2012, 02:53:07 PM

Title: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Nagumo on August 03, 2012, 02:53:07 PM
This is coming from an indirect source but according to some guy from the 1up board Paul Anderson confirmed at Comic Con that the movie was still being planned. That also means he is still involved somehow. 

http://www.1up.com/boards/posts/list/57459.page (http://www.1up.com/boards/posts/list/57459.page)

Yay? Nay?   
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Kingshango on August 03, 2012, 03:08:12 PM
It's a video game movie, so NAY is set on default until I see it.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Dremn on August 03, 2012, 03:25:59 PM
It's getting a huge revamp to be based on LoS I bet.

Also, Nay. I don't want to see this happen. At all.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Nagumo on August 03, 2012, 03:29:16 PM
It's getting a huge revamp to be based on LoS I bet.

I wouldn't wish such a cruel fate on any LoS fan.  :(
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Chernabogue on August 03, 2012, 04:06:19 PM
If only movies were done by people interested in the universe or the story of the game(s) (or other things, such as books) and not by the "omg game movie lolol $$$$" fact, many movies would have been better.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Nagumo on August 03, 2012, 04:16:12 PM
Here is an (incomplete) version of the script done by Ian Jeffers. It seems to be based on Dracula' s Curse but it is clearly its own universe. I think it seems really mediocre but I suppose you can do a lot worse with video game movies.   
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Chernabogue on August 03, 2012, 04:29:04 PM
Here is an (incomplete) version of the script done by Ian Jeffers. It seems to be based on Dracula' s Curse but it is clearly its own universe. I think it seems really mediocre but I suppose you can do a lot worse with video game movies.   
Where did you get it? Pretty interesting, but yeah, kinda mediocre. I prefer the Studio 51 script (the guys who wanted to do an animated CVIII movie).
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Nagumo on August 03, 2012, 04:30:10 PM
I know a guy who knows a guy.  :)

I believe it came from Bloody Disgusting.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Flame on August 03, 2012, 05:22:27 PM
Why cant they just get the guys who made Van Hellsing? They obviously wanted really bad to make a CV movie but had to settle for something only slightly different.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: uzo on August 03, 2012, 06:02:22 PM
Where did you get it? Pretty interesting, but yeah, kinda mediocre. I prefer the Studio 51 script (the guys who wanted to do an animated CVIII movie).

You sure about that? Did you see what they did to Alucard? There's also the
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Dremn on August 03, 2012, 06:06:23 PM
They should go the Ace Attorney route for Castlevania; Make it as campy and close to the original video game as possible, that's how videogame movies SHOULD be. I would pay good money to see Simon whipping walls for pot roast and tossing axes at Death on the big screen. It would be a movie that only takes itself as seriously as it has to, and it would be right up Konami's alley for their goofy and lovable reputation.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Chernabogue on August 03, 2012, 07:12:47 PM
You sure about that? Did you see what they did to Alucard? There's also the
(click to show/hide)
I think it was more a joke than something else.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Munchy on August 03, 2012, 10:38:54 PM
It's a video game movie, so NAY is set on default until I see it.

Ditto. Even Silent Hill got fucked up in the transition.

And it's Paul Anderson, which means the best I can hope for is shit on a shingle.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: beingthehero on August 03, 2012, 10:44:53 PM
He wasn't always a terrible director. Mortal Kombat is still the best video game film adaption, and Event Horizon was legitimately good. Too bad he hasn't made anything decent since the late 90s.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: darkwzrd4 on August 03, 2012, 11:28:34 PM
Why can't they just do the humane thing and this monstrosity out of its misery.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: James Belmont on August 04, 2012, 01:29:03 AM
I've got a draft of the script by Anderson dated June 19th, 2006 if anyone is interested.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Ratty on August 04, 2012, 01:38:25 AM
Guys, it's Anderson. We'll be lucky if he doesn't cast his wife as Simona Belmont, or some chick who dispatches all the monsters while the Belmonts watch uselessly.
It'll barely have anything to do with the source material. A poorly scripted movie with Vampires and probably 2 scenes in a castle. A character named Soma will be the goofy sidekick who dies and some character named Alucard will be the big bad. (Gotta save Dracula for the inevitable sequel.) It'll also make a bajillion dollars and hijack the popular conception of the franchise.

The only reason he didn't mess up Mortal Kombat was because it barely had a plot to mess up in the first place, and said story was largely a homage to cheesy martial arts flicks anyway.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: NocturnalMango on August 04, 2012, 01:43:46 AM
Hopefully this will be a case of "It's so bad that it's good".
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Phoenix7786 on August 04, 2012, 04:14:35 AM
If only movies were done by people interested in the universe or the story of the game(s) (or other things, such as books) and not by the "omg game movie lolol $$$$" fact, many movies would have been better.

Case in point go watch Thomas Jane's Dirty Laundry short to see what it looks like when a guy who likes a universe of something is calling the shots.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: knightmere on August 04, 2012, 05:01:54 AM
I wouldn't hold your breath on this steaming pile ever coming to fruition.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Nagumo on August 04, 2012, 06:56:28 AM
I've got a draft of the script by Anderson dated June 19th, 2006 if anyone is interested.


Yes, please.  That's the script with Castlevania in New York, right?
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: James Belmont on August 04, 2012, 11:43:54 AM
Alright then. I can't attach it though, it's too big. I can send it via email though.

I haven't read it yet, myself. I was too caught up reading Dracula: Year Zero and The Last Voyage of the Demeter, and knowing what I did about Paul WTF Anderson's Castlelamea didn't entice me to sit down and go through it. I've still got Sherlock Holmes and the Vengeance of Dracula waiting to be read too.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: mistressalucard on August 04, 2012, 01:58:29 PM
I believe a movie is happening when its in the theater and I am watching it.  I've been down this road a few many times now.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Ravvie on August 04, 2012, 04:08:58 PM
I don't know about you but I'm not counting on this ever coming out of development heck. And even if it does...I doubt it's gonna be any good enough for a pity watch. Spluh. I've said it before, I'll say it again- video games don't translate to movies very well, and vice versa.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Chernabogue on August 04, 2012, 04:36:53 PM
Alright then. I can't attach it though, it's too big. I can send it via email though.
I'd be interested in reading it. :)
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: DragonSlayr81 on August 04, 2012, 08:32:54 PM
Guys, it's Anderson. We'll be lucky if he doesn't cast his wife as Simona Belmont, or some chick who dispatches all the monsters while the Belmonts watch uselessly.
Milla Jovovich cast as Sonia Belmont... you KNOW it to be true!!! ;)




Yes, please.  That's the script with Castlevania in New York, right?
Wait... what?! CV in NYC? Hey James, if this is true, I'm interested! Wonder if it reads like how the Super Mario movie read? ;D
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: James Belmont on August 04, 2012, 09:05:58 PM
I'd be interested in reading it. :)
Sure. Anyone who's interested, just shoot me a PM with your email address and I'll send it over as soon as I can.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: beingthehero on August 04, 2012, 09:46:09 PM
It had the twist that Lords had, with the epilogue being set in the present day. It didn't work in the movie script, and it's one of my biggest beefs with Lords.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: KaZudra on August 04, 2012, 11:43:23 PM
Paul W.S. Anderson? HELL NO, Last thing I need to see is Katana wielding Milla Jovovich trying to pose off as Belmont.
Can we get someone who knows what the fuck they are doing?
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Ratty on August 05, 2012, 01:49:03 AM
Milla Jovovich cast as Sonia Belmont... you KNOW it to be true!!! ;)

Nope, that would make too much sense and require him to know or care anything at all about the Castlevania universe/continuity.
Anderson's idea of an "adaptation" is more along the lines of having a totally unrelated story with a few elements from the series (like, say, zombies) then putting name-drops on characters who have no resemblance to their game "inspirations".** Also I don't know if he's capable of making films without his wife as a Mary-Sue anymore. I don't even get why people enjoy her performances. Suffice it to say, if the best movie you've done in the 5th Element, there may be some problem with your chosen career path.

But if the whims of chance are kind to the series Anderson's movie will never get out of development hell. T'would be better for the series to die with dignity than for that to happen.

**For those unfamiliar with his work here's just one example - He named a character "K-Mart" in one Resident Evil movie (Subtle product placement there!) only to later "reveal" she was a familiar series heroine in another movie, not that the characters were in any way alike.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Lumi Kløvstad on August 05, 2012, 02:10:46 AM
I actually enjoyed the Resident Evil movies more than any of the post RE4 games.

Does that make me a bad person?

EDIT: I like them because they're whimsical B-movies with a taste for the XTREME and hot female protagonists. Not because they're in any way good. I just think the games have gotten a bit too action movie anyway, and if I want Action Movie RE, I'll watch the movies, thank you.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Claimh Solais on August 05, 2012, 04:01:36 AM
Milla Jovovich cast as Sonia Belmont... you KNOW it to be true!!! ;)

I would not be surprised. At ALL.

I actually enjoyed the Resident Evil movies more than any of the post RE4 games.

Does that make me a bad person?

EDIT: I like them because they're whimsical B-movies with a taste for the XTREME and hot female protagonists. Not because they're in any way good. I just think the games have gotten a bit too action movie anyway, and if I want Action Movie RE, I'll watch the movies, thank you.

Anderson's movies aren't bad movies at all. In fact, they're pretty good action movies. But Resident Evil movies? No. Nothing about them screams Resident Evil to me.

How does THIS (http://www.relyonhorror.com/re3_carlos.jpg) become THIS (http://media.giantbomb.com/uploads/4/40309/1225916-re2_carlos_olivera_1.jpg)?! They didn't even spell Oliveira right.

In any case, I actually enjoyed the first movie the most, followed up by Apocalypse. When psychic powers came in, I was just like, "What the hell am I even watching anymore?"
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Lumi Kløvstad on August 05, 2012, 05:53:45 AM
Eh. I never really gave two fucks for the in-game canon anyway. Whatever it began as, it's basically been reduced to just a Japanese perception of a western action game with zombies in it at this point.

In that respect the movies were more or less entirely faithful to the source material... story, characters, or timelines be damned, at least the first two films got the tone right. And then it looks like John Woo and Ang Lee double teamed the writing staff after that.

Now to get back on track, a Castlevania movie should be more Van Helsing than Resident Evil, as had been stated before.

Failing that, I will accept a few alternatives if VAN HELSING proves too hard to rehash (God forbid that we might live in such a world):

A movie in the vein of the Neil Gaiman penned and Robert Zemickis directed "Beowulf"; in that the story is similar enough to be recognizable, but the production staff really goes to town on the trivial details and in the end makes it a totally different story that has the same events and world as the source material.

OR,

The "Dante's Inferno: An Animated Epic" style, where the film is basically scene for scene yanked from the game with some trivial changes but a more complete and flowing story, rather than cutscenes linked by sequences of killing things. Seriously, that movie was pretty awesome.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Chernabogue on August 05, 2012, 06:02:16 AM
I'd like an animated movie with graphics like the ones in the LoS2 trailer.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Claimh Solais on August 05, 2012, 06:43:47 AM
I'd like an animated movie with graphics like the ones in the LoS2 trailer.

(https://castlevaniadungeon.net/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_m7swjyecpf1r1rm6n.jpg&hash=74cacd557976c5485efc500d93a1f5b709af9536)
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Nagumo on August 05, 2012, 08:05:52 AM
Anderson is not directing the movie. Last time I heard it the director was going to be James Wan. I really liked how he explained his view on the series, so that gave me a little faith. He is going to incorporate an element that the Anderson script severely lacked: having the main character actually wield a whip.

Aside from the whip, I think there should be a few other core elements that should be in a CV movie. First of all, they should really try to evoke a creepy, gothic atmosphere. Think rolling fog, creepy graveyards, candles casting unsettling shadows, etc. Something like a Tim Burton movie. Sleepy Hollow is a very good example. Secondly, although this may be difficult due to budget constrains, they should show (or at the very least strongly imply) that Dracula commands an entire army of monsters instead of just having a handful of lackies. I felt the Anderson script really went wrong in that respect. Having a monster mash movie further strengthes the connection between the games.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Ratty on August 05, 2012, 10:23:54 AM
I actually enjoyed the Resident Evil movies more than any of the post RE4 games.

Does that make me a bad person?

Yes, you're a bad person and you should feel bad. >:( nah I'm just kiddin' yah. I like my fair share of crap to. Well, more than my fair share probably.
But I just dislike how utterly disrespectful to the fans of the series his adaptations are. It's like "We've got the license, why worry about adaptation? We can just knock out a cheapie with a few of the same concepts, maybe some name-drops. It'll be fine. We'll just use the name to attract a general audience who are vaguely aware the games exist." Anderson is just a better funded Uwe Boll in my mind. Not that RE is "sacred" (I'm not even that big a fan really) but nonetheless it is a series that is important to a lot of people. Capcom had George Romero ready to make a proper zombie film adaptation of the first game, and that probably would have been a hit. Which just makes the movies that were made seem even more unnecessarily disrespectful to the real fans.

Eh. I never really gave two fucks for the in-game canon anyway. Whatever it began as, it's basically been reduced to just a Japanese perception of a western action game with zombies in it at this point.

In that respect the movies were more or less entirely faithful to the source material... story, characters, or timelines be damned, at least the first two films got the tone right. And then it looks like John Woo and Ang Lee double teamed the writing staff after that.

I think the success of the movies as just action pieces helped convince Capcom to turn the games in that direction. (RE4 was initially set to be a real survival horror game after all, look up some of the footage of the original version of the game.) Though I can't see how you think the movies captured the feel of the early games, it's hard to feel afraid with a Ninjitsu Mary-Sue kicking ass left and right. That's why "Devil May Cry" became it's own series instead of a RE sequel.

Anderson is not directing the movie. Last time I heard it the director was going to be James Wan. I really liked how he explained his view on the series, so that gave me a little faith. He is going to incorporate an element that the Anderson script severely lacked: having the main character actually wield a whip.

As long as he doesn't stick his nose into it too much "Hey, Wan! Buddy, pal! The movies looking great but you know what it could use more of? My wife! Just nerf all of the characters from the source material until they're useless and have her kick ass for an hour- the audiences'll love it!" But yeah if he sticks to just giving money to the project without forcing too much of his personal input it might turn out halfway decent.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Flame on August 05, 2012, 03:29:59 PM
Quote
Something like a Tim Burton movie.
Now im trying to visualize a Burton Castlevania, and to be honest, not sure if want...
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Ratty on August 05, 2012, 10:46:18 PM
Now im trying to visualize a Burton Castlevania, and to be honest, not sure if want...

Alucard would be a little boy from 60s suburbia* transported to a whimsical, gothic castle full of goofy skeletons and a hint of nightmare fuel. In the end we'd find out the whole thing was about Bu- er, Alucard's daddy issues.

*Johnny Depp in mo-cap? Alucard would have to be a kid in any case.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Ahasverus on August 05, 2012, 11:28:57 PM
No Christopher Nolan, no deal
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Johnny Alucard on August 05, 2012, 11:39:50 PM
I still have no faith in it ever getting past the development hell stage.

Lords of Shadow was already cinematic enough anyway.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: DragonSlayr81 on August 06, 2012, 12:59:22 AM
I'd like an animated movie with graphics like the ones in the LoS2 trailer.
So, you want a CG movie?



Anderson is not directing the movie. Last time I heard it the director was going to be James Wan. I really liked how he explained his view on the series, so that gave me a little faith. He is going to incorporate an element that the Anderson script severely lacked: having the main character actually wield a whip.

Aside from the whip, I think there should be a few other core elements that should be in a CV movie. First of all, they should really try to evoke a creepy, gothic atmosphere. Think rolling fog, creepy graveyards, candles casting unsettling shadows, etc. Something like a Tim Burton movie. Sleepy Hollow is a very good example. Secondly, although this may be difficult due to budget constrains, they should show (or at the very least strongly imply) that Dracula commands an entire army of monsters instead of just having a handful of lackies. I felt the Anderson script really went wrong in that respect. Having a monster mash movie further strengthes the connection between the games.
I think James Wan would have potential. He's pretty good at what he does(I loved Insidious), and he DID seem like a fan who was familiar with the CV series. I recall Sylvain White was also set to direct it(and he also was a fan of the series). I think, to capture that CV feel, it has to be someone familiar with the series. You can't have some pretentious prick step in and quick glace everything CV and say, "That's all stupid. Get rid of it. Let's make it somewhat grounded in reality. Let's introduce vampires as being victims of a genetic disorder that makes them sensative to UV lights. Let's make a world with deep drama like Game of Thrones. Really Hard-R, adult stuff!!!".

I agree with the monster mash thing. And I might seem to be ranting regarding this, but that's what I didn't care for in LoS. I guess it was a dream of mine that, if there should ever be a good HD 3D CV, I always wanted to see all those classic monsters appear. CV was, intially, Monster Mash: The Game. You had Dracula(Bela Lugosi looking), Frankenstein's monster(Karloff looking), Mummy, Fishman/Merman(Creature from the Black Lagoon), as well as others like Death and Medusa(they'd add Werewolf/wolfman later). I think I consider myself a horror fan more than CV fan, which is why I've always wanted to see these guys appear in an HD CV game. IGA didn't even include them all in LoI and CoD(though I did love the nod to Queen Medusa as being a giant floating Medusa Head boss that, like in CV1, was initially a stone bust that comes to life). I want to see those monsters again! Add Phantom Bat for good measure, but yeah. CV(well, orgiinal canon) always had those nods to horror pop culture. Pazuzu(the demon in The Exorcist) in HoD, those Leatherface guys in OoE, Invisible Men, Pupppet Master, and isn't me, or did those Evil Force heads look like Freddy Kruegers with demon horns? Love those nods to horror, because, if there was no horror movies, I don't think CV would even exist.  ;)


No Christopher Nolan, no deal
(click to show/hide)
Howabout just "No Chris Nolan".  :)

I think he's overrated. He's done some good movies, but I didn't like Dark Knight Rises as much as I thought I would've(thought it was the weakest of the trilogy, which oddly enough, I like in order of their release). Inception didn't blow me away, either.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Munchy on August 06, 2012, 01:40:32 AM
Hopefully this will be a case of "It's so bad that it's good".

This is my hope too, because it's the closest I'll get to legitimate enjoyment out of the thing.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Neobelmont on August 06, 2012, 02:25:38 AM

I'd like an animated movie with graphics like the ones in the LoS2 trailer.

(https://castlevaniadungeon.net/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_m7swjyecpf1r1rm6n.jpg&hash=74cacd557976c5485efc500d93a1f5b709af9536)

I really like this , but still name a CGI game movie besides final fantasy the spirits within that does not suck, VII Advent Children,and Resident evil degeneration both rock so a cgi cv movie like LoS should be done heck there was a topic a few days ago on here that said Lords of shadow the movie or something. LoS has about two hours worth of cutscenes in total from what I watched or more.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: DragonSlayr81 on August 06, 2012, 02:54:08 AM
I really like this , but still name a CGI game movie besides final fantasy the spirits within that does not suck, VII Advent Children,and Resident evil degeneration both rock so a cgi cv movie like LoS should be done heck there was a topic a few days ago on here that said Lords of shadow the movie or something. LoS has about two hours worth of cutscenes in total from what I watched or more.
Visually, AC didn't suck, but the presentation was less "movie" and more "long CG cutscene". I think Square even mentioned that this was their primary intent, that they were aiming to make it like a giant cut-scene(or a series of cut-scenes spliced together), which they succeeded in, but to me, it felt off. Also, Anything clumped together as part of the FFVII Compilation I shake off as as being uneeded. FFVII was a nice, self contained world with mysteries still present, but what FFVII Compilation did was open new cans of worms, addressing concepts that weren't even present in the original game(basically making secret crap up as they went along). The result was to convolute FFVII's world even more than it actually was. Not to mention indroducing the cluster-fuck of multiple world ending threats all happening within an 8 year period.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Chernabogue on August 06, 2012, 05:38:26 AM
Yeah, exactly, a movie like FFVII:AC would be great.

However, I really think FFVII:AC is NOT a film everyone can watch, as it is hard to understand for a person who has not played the game first.

But an animated CVIII or Bloodlines movie (or even LoS, eh - well, I did a movie with LoS footage too) would rock if well set.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Claimh Solais on August 06, 2012, 06:45:14 AM
Yeah, exactly, a movie like FFVII:AC would be great.

However, I really think FFVII:AC is NOT a film everyone can watch, as it is hard to understand for a person who has not played the game first.

The Complete version tells the story better in a way a new fan could understand it, but even then, it'll come across as weird.

But still, a CGI Castlevania movie would probably be better. In the case of Resident Evil, I much preferred Degeneration to any of the live-action films, and Damnation is shaping up to be pretty good-looking.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Ahasverus on August 06, 2012, 02:00:55 PM
  Howabout just "No Chris Nolan".  :)

I think he's overrated. He's done some good movies, but I didn't like Dark Knight Rises as much as I thought I would've(thought it was the weakest of the trilogy, which oddly enough, I like in order of their release). Inception didn't blow me away, either.
He's the best director of his generation and he's just starting. Also he has shown a good deal of respect for the source material whilr still completely understanding what makes a movie work like a movie, also he doesn't make you feel like your neurones are dying without being boring or pretentious. And don't get me started on how spot on he is for casting...

So yeah Chris FTW.


And I also support the idea of a CGI film made by the LoS trailer guys.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Flame on August 06, 2012, 02:52:52 PM
The Complete version tells the story better in a way a new fan could understand it, but even then, it'll come across as weird.

But still, a CGI Castlevania movie would probably be better. In the case of Resident Evil, I much preferred Degeneration to any of the live-action films, and Damnation is shaping up to be pretty good-looking.
Watching AC Complete I was left wondering why that extra shit wasnt in the original movie to begin with, considering it clarifies many things, makes certain transitions more sensical, etc.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Claimh Solais on August 06, 2012, 03:59:54 PM
Watching AC Complete I was left wondering why that extra shit wasnt in the original movie to begin with, considering it clarifies many things, makes certain transitions more sensical, etc.

According to Square, it was because of deadlines. You know how they like taking their sweet-ass time with things (coughVersusXIIIcough).
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Chernabogue on August 07, 2012, 04:29:20 AM
According to Square, it was because of deadlines. You know how they like taking their sweet-ass time with things (coughVersusXIIIcough).
LOL
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: VladCT on August 07, 2012, 04:40:39 AM
Is Versus even still in development? I've yet to hear a single word about it since forever. Then again, I don't really follow the FFXIII spin-offs.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Lumi Kløvstad on August 07, 2012, 05:09:20 AM
Is Versus even still in development? I've yet to hear a single word about it since forever. Then again, I don't really follow the FFXIII spin-offs.

They just announced last week via Twitter it was still on. WHY it's still on after taking 6 years I haven't the foggiest.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: VladCT on August 07, 2012, 05:13:40 AM
Maybe they're still having second thoughts about making a FF that's considerably more "mature", so to speak.
I dunno about the fan demand, but it's gotta be high enough that it's still on.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: DragonSlayr81 on August 07, 2012, 02:36:24 PM
Maybe they're still having second thoughts about making a FF that's considerably more "mature", so to speak.
I dunno about the fan demand, but it's gotta be high enough that it's still on.
I actually think it's problems might be due to the scope of the game. Nomura has hinted that he's trying to achieve full scale world map, and just recently Wada made the remark about how blown away he was in seening one of the cities in a recent weekly conference. From the footage of the 2011 trailer, some of the landscapes seen look near size to Xenoblade Chronicles-caliber. If they can achieve that on HD(which other FF heads like Kitase and Toriyama said cannot be done), it would be a big achievement for the series. FFXIV aside, FFXIII(and FFXIII-2) were mainly linear games with little to no exploration(at least not to the extent of some of the classic games). Re-introducing a huge explorable world just might be the next step in the series' evolution. I mean, if Versus can pull it off, there's no excuse for the next FF(FFXV) to not, at least, aim for that standard. Reverting back to linear pathways/limited freedom of exploraion is a step back in comparison.

Okay, let's get back on topic.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Fofa on August 07, 2012, 08:00:10 PM
They should go the Ace Attorney route for Castlevania; Make it as campy and close to the original video game as possible, that's how videogame movies SHOULD be. I would pay good money to see Simon whipping walls for pot roast and tossing axes at Death on the big screen. It would be a movie that only takes itself as seriously as it has to, and it would be right up Konami's alley for their goofy and lovable reputation.

Or they could post some person's playthrough of one of the longer games. Cheaper than hiring actors, that's for certain.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: SaibotMK on August 10, 2012, 12:47:25 AM
Or they could post some person's playthrough of one of the longer games. Cheaper than hiring actors, that's for certain.

LOL that just gave me the best idea ever, throw in like a 5min legitimmate intro, like with previews of other newer movies etc. Upload it to youtube just for the purpose of going over to my friends house that have Apple TV. Have them sitting down with there food cause there a bunch of fat asses (lol not really, well sort of actually yes) ready to watch a movie. The intro passes and you see Simon Belmont running through the first stage, by the time he is half way through they probably will finally ask "Dude, wtf is this?" then I say without laughing "Its great, it gets better guys just watch". By the time stage 2 starts they are like "WTF is this?" and thats when I probably won't be able to hold a straight face and its blown.

Okay I am trying this, now to find a downloadable playthrough of a Castlevania game preferably a older one.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Lumi Kløvstad on August 10, 2012, 02:05:42 AM
LOL that just gave me the best idea ever, throw in like a 5min legitimmate intro, like with previews of other newer movies etc. Upload it to youtube just for the purpose of going over to my friends house that have Apple TV. Have them sitting down with there food cause there a bunch of fat asses (lol not really, well sort of actually yes) ready to watch a movie. The intro passes and you see Simon Belmont running through the first stage, by the time he is half way through they probably will finally ask "Dude, wtf is this?" then I say without laughing "Its great, it gets better guys just watch". By the time stage 2 starts they are like "WTF is this?" and thats when I probably won't be able to hold a straight face and its blown.

Okay I am trying this, now to find a downloadable playthrough of a Castlevania game preferably a older one.

Rickrolling for a new generation. I love it.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: JR on August 10, 2012, 08:54:13 AM
I still don't know how this was ever greenlit (the most popular response during the pitch probably being, "Castlewhat again??"). How could anyone think this would make money? The concept still kind of baffles me. Not to beat up on the franchise or anything, but it just doesn't seem to be a prominent enough name to evoke anything better than apathy from moviegoers.

Just...a Castlevania movie?? I mean, it still sounds so bizarre.
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Nagumo on August 10, 2012, 09:28:59 AM
I think most regular most moviegoers would already be turned off by the title. It has to be said that "Castlevania" is a pretty dumb name. 
Title: Re: Castlevania movie still on (nothing spectacular).
Post by: Ratty on August 10, 2012, 12:05:39 PM
I think most regular most moviegoers would already be turned off by the title. It has to be said that "Castlevania" is a pretty dumb name.

I dunno, I like the title but maybe I'm in too much of a late 80s video game mode when I think of it. It certainly couldn't be said that your average moviegoer would think about the name in the same way us longtime fans do though. The simple and obvious solution (much to simple and obvious for Hollywood) is to just call it "Devil's Castle Dracula" or a similar translation if it ever comes out.

I still don't know how this was ever greenlit (the most popular response during the pitch probably being, "Castlewhat again??"). How could anyone think this would make money? The concept still kind of baffles me. Not to beat up on the franchise or anything, but it just doesn't seem to be a prominent enough name to evoke anything better than apathy from moviegoers.

Just...a Castlevania movie?? I mean, it still sounds so bizarre.

Castlevania could make a fun monster mash up film evoking Universal's 1940s romps, but with more teeth. That wouldn't happen though, studios are scrambling to find anything with Vampires. And the rule now is that all Vamps all decidedly post-Rice if not post-Meyer misunderstood anti-heroes. So if Castlevania is ever made into a movie I expect them to try to make Dracula sympathetic which is counter to the spirit of the series imo.

As for why they're even trying to adapt it I think RedLetterMedia explained the remake/adaptation bonanze of the last decade best in their review of "Star Trek 2009" http://redlettermedia.com/plinkett/star-trek/star-trek-09/ (http://redlettermedia.com/plinkett/star-trek/star-trek-09/)