Castlevania Dungeon Forums

The Castlevania Dungeon Forums => General Castlevania Discussion => Topic started by: Lumi Kløvstad on February 22, 2016, 01:08:55 AM

Title: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Lumi Kløvstad on February 22, 2016, 01:08:55 AM
Obviously Graham Jones believed that he was the true heir of Dracula because he was born on the day/moment of Dracula's demise; and let's be fair, he got pretty far along with his scheme; acquiring Dracula's power and the ability to Hulk Out, dark lord style is no small feat.

But what about Dario? Or Dmitri? Are there other candidates? Is the criteria really as simple as "be born when Dracula died"? If so, how specific does the timing have to be? By that criteria alone, there are potentially hundreds to thousands of dark lord candidates out there if Soma decides he's not up for the job.

Or, perhaps, this whole "criteria" notion is a load of crap, and anyone could be a potential replacement for Dracula -- all it takes is a suitable surrender to the darkness within and a willingness to go to any lengths to obtain the power (Graham didn't really exhibit any Dark Lord powers until after he stabbed Yoko, for instance).

Dracula himself surrendered to his own inner darkness and was certainly willing to do horrific things to obtain the power. Murder, deception, theft... pretty much the worst stuff in the Bible -- and all were sinful acts Mathias had to commit before he became the dark lord. And we don't know how Walter assumed that mantle either, but it probably wasn't something to do with how nice a guy he was and how many orphans he fed, unless he fed them to the Forgotten One.

Quote from: Walter to unfortunate orphans (probably)
I said you’d be fed. I never said who I’d be feeding you to.
Quote from: Forgotten One
BLAAAAARG OMNOMNOMNOM

Clearly Chaos (for whatever reason) views Soma as the ideal heir (having something to do with being the reincarnated soul of Mathias probably has something to do with it), but anyone willing to go the evil distance of evil is likely an acceptable substitute.

Maybe evil just can't afford to be choosy.

Thoughts?
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: theplottwist on February 22, 2016, 02:22:11 AM
OK, many points here. I'll respond to some, some I won't.

Quote
(Graham didn't really exhibit any Dark Lord powers until after he stabbed Yoko, for instance).

OK, this one is interesting.

In the game it is never explained what his powers are, but in the light novel, Graham is said to have had the power to "perform miracles" before even getting to the eclipse. With these powers and his charisma, people started following him, believing him to be some sort of messiah. And with this, he managed to build what is described to be a religion. It grew to such enormous numbers that these followers' bodies were used to compose an entire replica of Dracula's Castle, and there were still a lot of people left.

So, while the specific nature of his miracles is not mentioned, it is implied he was able to do things like curing the ill.

Quote
And we don't know how Walter assumed that mantle either

We don't know even if he DID assume that mantle at all. Walter is never referred to as Dark Lord in any way.

Quote
Clearly Chaos (for whatever reason) views Soma as the ideal heir (having something to do with being the reincarnated soul of Mathias probably has something to do with it) but anyone willing to go the evil distance of evil is likely an acceptable substitute.

This bit is true. The only TRUE requirement for one to become the Dark Lord is the willingness to take over the forces of evil - namely, conquering demons.

First, we see this in Aria. Graham clearly possessed control over the castle, but he was STILL intent on killing Soma because he had "control over HIS demons". Then, in Dawn, Dmitrii pretty much confirms this in all letters, saying that the true heir to the Dark Lord position is not one who inherited powers from Dracula, but one who actually takes control over demons - with or without Dracula's powers.

So, naturally, Soma has the advantage here because he has the power of Dominance, which is a very convenient thing on controlling demons.

Now, to respond the question: I think there is no requirement beyond being born at the same exact moment of Dracula's death to become a candidate "officially". And yes, this means that there could be hundreds of other Dark Lord Candidates over the world. But, ultimatelly, what makes the Dark Lord is the control he exerts over demons.

But, of course, when you have magical powers this task becomes so much easier.

I think the powers simply attached themselves to the candidates by pure dumb luck.

What makes them special is not that they were choosen by these dark powers, but what they do with them.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: zangetsu468 on February 22, 2016, 05:11:26 AM
And with this, he managed to build what is described to be a religion. It grew to such enormous numbers that these followers' bodies were used to compose an entire replica of Dracula's Castle, and there were still a lot of people left.
Constructed from living or dead followers? #legioncastledracula ?
This wouldn't happen to be the towering replica of Dracula's Castle from Dawn would it?

FYI I always thought Graham resembled a well-dressed televangelist.

This bit is true. The only TRUE requirement for one to become the Dark Lord is the willingness to take over the forces of evil - namely, conquering demons.

True, although "Dracula" has been shown to have dominance over beings who are also holy (Archers) or human and undead (zombie soldiers).
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: theplottwist on February 22, 2016, 08:54:39 AM
Constructed from living or dead followers? #legioncastledracula ?

This is exactly what the castle is called on the novel. I'm not even kidding.

Quote
This wouldn't happen to be the towering replica of Dracula's Castle from Dawn would it?

Nope. This is another replica.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: VladCT on February 22, 2016, 09:32:36 AM
This is exactly what the castle is called on the novel. I'm not even kidding.
Does it sound any less ridiculous in Japanese? :V
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Lelygax on February 22, 2016, 09:38:10 AM
This is exactly what the castle is called on the novel. I'm not even kidding.

Nope. This is another replica.

It happens on the novel? I still have to read it (and would appreciate a direct link :P)


(Graham didn't really exhibit any Dark Lord powers until after he stabbed Yoko, for instance).
He surely had some sort of power to survive in this castle full of demons alone, while being able to come close and stab a powerful spellcaster (surely he could've used some kind of deception to come closer and stab Yoko, like pretending to surrender, but the same kind can't be done with demons unless he did MGS tactics lol)

I always thought that he also had the power of dominance like Soma, but was unfortunate and didn't found Dracula's powers, maybe because of destiny.

And we don't know how Walter assumed that mantle either

He didn't. In fact Dracula only became a Dark Lord after they killed Lisa, before that he was only rebelling against God with his immortality and gaining power.

Clearly Chaos (for whatever reason) views Soma as the ideal heir (having something to do with being the reincarnated soul of Mathias probably has something to do with it), but anyone willing to go the evil distance of evil is likely an acceptable substitute.

As plottwist said, anyone willing to can become a Dark Lord. But IMO this person needs some kind of power to be able to. In fact if I'm remebering it right, in the novel Olrox tries to become a Dark Lord.

Does it sound any less ridiculous in Japanese? :V

Legion Akumajo Dracula? :V  (I use this emoticon daily with my friends, good to see another person that appreciate it)
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: theplottwist on February 22, 2016, 11:11:09 AM
Does it sound any less ridiculous in Japanese? :V

Oh well, I wasn't being literal with Zangetsu's hashtag.

In the novel, the castle itself is referred to as "Legion" AND as a replica of Dracula's castle (initially thought to be the true castle). Not only it is composed from the bodies of the many Graham followers, but it actually comes alive at a certain point to try to kill the protagonists.

There is a Legion inside who is fought by Julius Belmont, but thanks to the enormous amount of corpses and the fact that it is connected to the castle, it can attack in many places at once, if I remember correctly.

It happens on the novel? I still have to read it (and would appreciate a direct link :P)

You should thank Shiroi for that. This novel has very important information concerning the lore of the Sorrow saga. It even clarifies that monsters are born out of Chaos (including Death) - which is born from mankind. But beware - the way the story is told can get quite confusing sometimes, where you don't even know who is speaking or what do they mean by what they said. I had to stop translating this to portuguese at a certain point because I was simply not understanding specific sections (I did understand them later but I'm too lazy...).

http://castlevaniadungeon.net/forums/index.php/topic,6118.0.html (http://castlevaniadungeon.net/forums/index.php/topic,6118.0.html)
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Lelygax on February 22, 2016, 12:39:49 PM
You should thank Shiroi for that. This novel has very important information concerning the lore of the Sorrow saga. It even clarifies that monsters are born out of Chaos (including Death) - which is born from mankind. But beware - the way the story is told can get quite confusing sometimes, where you don't even know who is speaking or what do they mean by what they said. I had to stop translating this to portuguese at a certain point because I was simply not understanding specific sections (I did understand them later but I'm too lazy...).

http://castlevaniadungeon.net/forums/index.php/topic,6118.0.html (http://castlevaniadungeon.net/forums/index.php/topic,6118.0.html)

Thanks for the link, I knew about this thread but was a little lazy to search for it, I was active on the forum at the time and maybe even posted in this thread, I don't remember. Anyway, IF you want to I can help you to translate it ( help, not translate it alone, my actual condition makes me prone to abandon projects if I don't have incentive, sadly). I'm part of a blog that translates AVGN episodes, but I've only worker on Board James if that serves as an example of what I can do :)

Its interesting that this iteration of Castlevania can move and attack, because I thought of doing almost the same thing in a if I was going to do a fangame someday, but it would be the original Castlevania doing that, maybe with Dracula's help. Sadly they already did it 2 times (novel and LoS2? I dont know if they did it on LoS2 for sure...) so my idea won't will be so original anymore haha.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Dracula9 on February 22, 2016, 01:00:11 PM
I always thought it was a questionable fashion sense that made one a Candidate.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Lumi Kløvstad on February 22, 2016, 01:10:32 PM
He surely had some sort of power to survive in this castle full of demons alone

I think that "power" might have been a gun -- Aria itself demonstrates that firearms are effective weapons against the legions of Chaos, and I'm not just talking the game-breakingly uberpowered Positron Rifle either. That handgun that Soma can pick up (a 9 mil too!) can seriously dish out the hurt to even boss level characters when used properly.

I've actually beaten the game using nothing but the handgun (except for movement souls where absolutely required for progression). I will admit the Silver Gun is a better choice, however. This proves two things, in my mind.

1) It is HILARIOUS to see Soma Cruz walk into Dracula's Castle in his fluffy fur-trimmed white coat and Bell-Bottom-esque cut jeans and scream "NAH-UH! THIS IS HOW WE ROLL IN MAH NEIGHBORHOOD BITCH!!" and blow monsters away Projects-style, and 2) With some cleverness, Dracula's Castle (and almost anything in it) can be trumped by pitiful 9mm rounds, and Graham is nothing if not a clever man.

He doesn't need special powers to survive; he just needs to be armed.

I always thought it was a questionable fashion sense that made on a Candidate.

B-but Graham looks so fly, D9-san.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Lelygax on February 22, 2016, 02:17:26 PM
He doesn't need special powers to survive; he just needs to be armed.

Zombie Soldiers shows the opposite don't you think? They were well armed and still died on Castlevania. One thing that I always liked about Graham is that he is very charismatic but also seems to be a coward when notices real danger, I think that the most probably is that he was sneaking when strong monsters were nearby and absorbing power from weaker ones (or the castle itself).
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Dracula9 on February 22, 2016, 04:01:30 PM
B-but Graham looks so fly, D9-san.

Graham and Aria Soma are the ONLY exceptions.

Meanwhile we have this
(http://chapelofresonance.com/wiki/images/3/3a/Dmitrii-profile.jpg) and (http://chapelofresonance.com/wiki/images/5/5f/Dario_Dawn.jpg) and whatever the hell Soma was wearing in Dawn.

Dmitrii alone tips the scales in the favor of shitty fashion sense, I mean have you seen the guy.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: zangetsu468 on February 22, 2016, 05:15:00 PM
Re: Dario, I think fairy floss and mustard don't mix :rollseyes:
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: theANdROId on February 22, 2016, 07:20:48 PM
FYI I always thought Graham resembled a well-dressed televangelist.

Me too!!!  :D :D


It is HILARIOUS to see Soma Cruz walk into Dracula's Castle in his fluffy fur-trimmed white coat and Bell-Bottom-esque cut jeans and scream "NAH-UH! THIS IS HOW WE ROLL IN MAH NEIGHBORHOOD BITCH!!" and blow monsters away Projects-style.

This just makes me imagine Soma as some crappy 80s movie pimp.  ;) :P
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: X on February 22, 2016, 07:21:08 PM
Quote
I always thought it was a questionable fashion sense that made on a Candidate.

And this is why Soma became the dark lord in AoS over Graham, because of that god-awful coat of his  :P He was better-dressed in DoS.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Dracula9 on February 22, 2016, 07:33:35 PM
Are you mocking the pimp coat?
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: zangetsu468 on February 22, 2016, 08:00:49 PM
I thought Soma's fashion sense and hair was much better in AoS... He literally went from 'Mathias Jackson' to "Johnny Out-of-his-Deppth"  ???
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: TheTextGuy on February 22, 2016, 09:36:42 PM
I thought Soma's fashion sense and hair was much better in AoS... He literally went from 'Mathias Jackson' to "Johnny Out-of-his-Deppth"  ???

Does Soma really walk around in public wearing his DoS boots?  They're really tacky.  I think I'd take his AoS shoes anyday.

I think that "power" might have been a gun -- Aria itself demonstrates that firearms are effective weapons against the legions of Chaos, and I'm not just talking the game-breakingly uberpowered Positron Rifle either. That handgund that Soma can pick up (a 9 mil too!) can seriously dish out the hurt to even boss level characters when used properly.

Which makes me wonder... what would happen if the shotgun was introduced as a weapon called "The Boomstick"?
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Shiroi Koumori on February 23, 2016, 01:04:39 AM
In the novel, the castle itself is referred to as "Legion" AND as a replica of Dracula's castle (initially thought to be the true castle). Not only it is composed from the bodies of the many Graham followers, but it actually comes alive at a certain point to try to kill the protagonists.

Yup yup. The climax battle proves that the castle is made up of corpses (both humans and monsters). ewww.
If you forgot the link to Ricordanza, just look at my signature. :)

Are you mocking the pimp coat?

Never mock the pimp coat! Hahaha. Actually I think Kojima made Soma wear that coat due to the fact that it somehow mirrors Matthias' robes in LoI. Dat fur!
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: zangetsu468 on February 23, 2016, 02:16:29 AM
Shiroi, who takes part in the final battle?

If it is Julius is he still in his "Jamnesia" state at that time, which means he didn't have the VK?
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: theplottwist on February 23, 2016, 07:18:33 AM
Shiroi, who takes part in the final battle?

If it is Julius is he still in his "Jamnesia" state at that time, which means he didn't have the VK?

This story happens after Aria and Dawn, thus Julius has his memory and the whip. As for who takes part in it:

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: X on February 23, 2016, 11:02:08 AM
Quote
Actually I think Kojima made Soma wear that coat due to the fact that it somehow mirrors Matthias' robes in LoI. Dat fur!

Not quite since AoS was produced before LoI. And YES I'm MOKIN' the coat  8)

Quote
What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?

I think this pertains to someone who taps into the darkness in their own hearts beyond what is normally capable of. They push it to the breaking point until they become something other then a mere human being. Kinda like forcing a type of evolution on yourself, but one that's unnatural.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Lelygax on February 23, 2016, 11:55:26 AM
I think this pertains to someone who taps into the darkness in their own hearts beyond what is normally capable of. They push it to the breaking point until they become something other then a mere human being. Kinda like forcing a type of evolution on yourself, but one that's unnatural.

You think that it is what happened with Brauner? They seem to explain something similar.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: theplottwist on February 23, 2016, 12:09:56 PM
You think that it is what happened with Brauner? They seem to explain something similar.

This is a complicated issue.

The english manual says that it was Dracula's Castle which awakened his powers:
(http://i.imgur.com/w8kFpHm.png)

Yet, in-game script flat out contradicts this, by saying Brauner's powers were awakened by his grief alone:

Eric: Brauner lost his real daughters in World War One. His anger and grief awakened his hidden power, which he used to become a vampire.

So, I tend to value the in-game script above the english manuals, and the japanese manuals above every other source. Which leads me to ask for a favor: Can any of you japanese-speaking guys translate Brauner's official japanese bio?

(http://i.imgur.com/p31MhtW.png)

EDIT: Okay so I managed to "translate" more or less what this says. It says that Brauner became a vampire during the first World War. So there is NO WAY IN HELL the castle "awakened his powers" or turned him into a vampire. This happened many years before (as, again, Eric hints on the in-game script).

But a proper translation will be welcome :)
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Nagumo on February 23, 2016, 12:46:51 PM
Yeah, exactly. The relevant line is as follows: "The father of Stella and Loretta, and an artist who became a vampire during the course of World War I."
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Lumi Kløvstad on February 23, 2016, 01:40:17 PM
Yeah, exactly. The relevant line is as follows: "The father of Stella and Loretta, and an artist who became a vampire during the course of World War I."

Liz Bartley really got good with making misery infectious, didn't she?

Still, it explains why the Castle responded so positively to Brauner after he locked away Dracula's influence. In the absence of Dracula, Brauner's grief-cum-rage plus vampiric power probably made him into a more than qualified Dark Lord Candidate.

I wonder whether Dracula or Brauner would have been more dangerous in that role by that point in time.

This also creates a viable explanation for why the Castle responded well to Evil Maxim and Corrupted!Richter. In the case of Maxim, his (easily corrupted) desire to protect Lydie and best Juste + Dracula's worst character traits would cook up an ideal person to become a Dark Lord. In Richter's case, the power of a Belmont, the skill of one of their strongest descendents, and Shaft's partly magical, partly psychological more than mind control (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/MoreThanMindControl) had the potential to create an even stronger Dark Lord than Dracula. Fortunate then that Maria and Alucard were able to break Shaft's active corruption when they did.

Really, either one would have been a superb Dark Lord.

In the later context of modern Castlevania, I think it's pretty obvious that resurrecting Dracula might have been Shaft's original plan, but eventually it shifted to creating a new Dark Lord that could surpass Dracula. That's at least what I took home from Shaft's dialogue with Alucard. After Alucard defeated Richter (botching the "new Dark Lord" scheme), Shaft defaulted to resurrecting Dracula. And in a horrid coincidence of fate, Alucard had already done all the legwork required for that task and had also kindly brought all of Dracula's remains to one convenient spot, enabling the resurrection.

Nice job breaking it, hero.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: theplottwist on February 23, 2016, 01:46:43 PM
I wonder whether Dracula or Brauner would have been more dangerous in that role by that point in time.

Well. Brauner succeeded in killing a very experient vampire hunter. Dracula, though...
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: theplottwist on February 23, 2016, 02:34:16 PM
In Richter's case, the power of a Belmont, the skill of one of their strongest descendents, and Shaft's partly magical, partly psychological more than mind control (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/MoreThanMindControl) had the potential to create an even stronger Dark Lord than Dracula. Fortunate then that Maria and Alucard were able to break Shaft's active corruption when they did.

OK an important point here: Richter wasn't meant to be turned into the Dark Lord, but to be a sacrifice for Dracula. He was placed as a guard so Shaft could do the preparations, and ultimatelly sacrifice him. This is better clarified in the japanese version of SotN and in the PSP script rewrite. Alucard saved Richter from becoming a sacrifice, so Shaft simply modified his plans a little and decided to sacrifice Alucard's human side instead.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Lumi Kløvstad on February 23, 2016, 02:53:42 PM
OK an important point here: Richter wasn't meant to be turned into the Dark Lord, but to be a sacrifice for Dracula. He was placed as a guard so Shaft could do the preparations, and ultimatelly sacrifice him. This is better clarified in the japanese version of SotN and in the PSP script rewrite. Alucard saved Richter from becoming a sacrifice, so Shaft simply modified his plans a little and decided to sacrifice Alucard's human side instead.

Eh, agree to disagree on that plot point. I think that definitely was the original plan, but I do believe Shaft had made some adjustments after seeing how well Richter was working out. And then Alucard blew that plan to hell and Shaft basically went
Quote from: Shaft
Well dammit. Guess I should have seen that coming. Back to the original plan then. Only this time I don't have my awesome Belmont sacrifice, so instead I'll sacrifice half of Alucard's DNA (somehow; memo: work on gene splitting magic) and half his soul (again, memo: work on soul-splitting magic. Maybe Zobek in that next universe over knows a trick or two about that. Inquire. After I have developed inter-universe communication). Surely that will bring Dracula back. Oh wait he came back anyway, and I am killed by Alucard. Curses. Foiled again. Except totally not really. I am awesome.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Lelygax on February 23, 2016, 03:21:37 PM
OK an important point here: Richter wasn't meant to be turned into the Dark Lord, but to be a sacrifice for Dracula. He was placed as a guard so Shaft could do the preparations, and ultimatelly sacrifice him. This is better clarified in the japanese version of SotN and in the PSP script rewrite. Alucard saved Richter from becoming a sacrifice, so Shaft simply modified his plans a little and decided to sacrifice Alucard's human side instead.

Ditto, even on the english PS1 version it is clear that he was only gaining time and using Richter as a watchdog. But it seems that Shaft didn't really needed to sacrifice him or Alucard, it would only speed up the process.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Lumi Kløvstad on February 23, 2016, 03:47:36 PM
Getting away from Shaft's INTENT, would we agree that, sans a Dracula resurrection, the Castle would accept a corrupted Richter as Dark Lord? I mean, dude's own dialog pretty clearly states that Shaft's magic was just bringing Richter's own darkness to the surface. His fears of being discarded by history due to having already played his part, of never knowing another worthy foe to properly challenge his talents, etc. All that was in Richter from the beginning. All Shaft's magic did was enable him to act on those fears and insecurities. It's highly probable that Shaft wasn't directly controlling anything Richter did. All he had to do was use his magic to give Richter a little push and let the gravity of evil do the rest. Once Alucard destroyed the orb maintaining the spell, Richter's eyes were unclouded and he was able to make an informed, reasoned choice again.

Shaft's magic was simply taking advantage of something that was already there. So the question then becomes: would the Castle have truly accepted Richter as a true dark lord? I think if Shaft was actively controlling Richter's mind it wouldn't have since Richter wouldn't be making any sort of actual choices to embrace his own inner darkness and pursue a path of wickedness. Puppets don't become Lords, after all. The fact that it obeyed him at all suggests that Richter possessed (at the time) the proper qualities to become a true dark lord.

On a related note, wasn't more or less that exact thing the reason that the Belmonts were said to temporarily retire anyway? Would the Belmonts have been "stained" if Richter had just been a magical meatpuppet?
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: zangetsu468 on February 23, 2016, 04:07:46 PM
Richter was technically only Lord of Castle 1 though.

Do we know definitively that being Lord of Castle 1 = Lord of Castle 2
Because if not...

Also the IGA timeline states that after Richter's battle with Dracula there's something along the lines of Shaft entering into him at his most vulnerable/ weakened state.

If some evil entity enters your body, I don't care if you're mother Theresa, you will be susceptible to acting on and performing tasks that are fuelled by evil intention.
I believe the reasons Richter was 'ashamed' in the events that follow SOTN wasn't purely because of his actions but also the fact that he was vulnerable enough to allow shaft's evil/energy/whatever to enter him in the first place. It would've made him, the hero, feel helpless and weak.

Also even though Alucard only needs to break the orb in the Richter fight (where the fuck was Maria btw? No help whatsoever) If that was the real Richter fighting Alucard he could've just fucking killed him easily. The guy killed a CR Dracula just a few years before and was still in his prime.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Lumi Kløvstad on February 23, 2016, 05:08:32 PM
If that was the real Richter fighting Alucard he could've just fucking killed him easily. The guy killed a CR Dracula just a few years before and was still in his prime.

But he totally can.

If you fight Richter as soon as you can physically access the Throne Room, he will WRECK ALUCARD. With ease.

The only way you'll stand a chance statwise is to grind and get better gear, and as long as you're doing that, you tend to explore. This is the game's way of suggesting you along to the best ending, as via exploring, you are more likely to encounter Maria and get the Holy Glasses, which enables the ability to even work for the best ending.

But if you just straight up hit Richter as soon as you physically can, your triumph only nets you the worst ending. And you have to work HARD for that triumph as Richter measurably outclasses you in almost every way that matters.

It's just by the time you have the Holy Glasses, Alucard is upgraded up the wazoo, lending the impression that Richter is weak. Richter is as strong as he ever was; Alucard has just gotten more powerful by comparison as Richter has stopped advancing in strength while Alucard has been increasing in strength, which closes the gap between the two.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: zangetsu468 on February 23, 2016, 05:35:26 PM
Levelling up isn't a canon set of events though.

Things like Alucard acquiring his abilities and even certain specific weapons or key items such as relic, holy glasses etc is.

There's no true indication of how levelled up one can get, if at all.

Of course if the game is longer and you get the better ending then presumably your warrior would be more skilled.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: TheTextGuy on February 23, 2016, 06:39:41 PM
Levelling up isn't a canon set of events though.

Things like Alucard acquiring his abilities and even certain specific weapons or key items such as relic, holy glasses etc is.

There's no true indication of how levelled up one can get, if at all.

Of course if the game is longer and you get the better ending then presumably your warrior would be more skilled.

Which makes me wonder of an alternate universe where the heroes of the Metroidvania games completed their task with high level speedrun strats.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: zangetsu468 on February 23, 2016, 07:46:08 PM
For the games that offer them I accept the hardest mode and Level 1 HMC to be canon ;)
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Lumi Kløvstad on February 23, 2016, 08:36:12 PM
Levelling up isn't a canon set of events though.

Things like Alucard acquiring his abilities and even certain specific weapons or key items such as relic, holy glasses etc is.

There's no true indication of how levelled up one can get, if at all.

Of course if the game is longer and you get the better ending then presumably your warrior would be more skilled.

True, but leveling up is a gameplay mechanic that represents growing stronger, and the in-story version is likely very different to due to Gameplay and Story Segregation.

Therefore, I shall treat you to a little impromptu prose describing more or less exactly how things likely went down, reimagining leveling up, save points and other gameplay elements as their more mundane, in-universe counterparts. Enjoy.

Quote
Alucard knew now that he had been a fool. It had been absurd to think that he could have taken on the man who had defeated his father -- Alucard hadn't even come close himself to being as strong as Dracula. Crawling away from the battle, bleeding and half dead, he sought a place of refuge where he could rest. He needed to mend his wounds. His fairy, a true companion, loyal from the start, tugged at his cloak trying in vain to help her best friend and master to a place where healing could begin. Alucard knew she didn't have the physical strength to actually help him move faster, but he smiled a weak smile, appreciating the efforts she made for him.

He knew why Richter wasn't chasing him. Richter had said it himself. He wanted worthier opponents. Someone to test himself against. Alucard hadn't been it. Not by a long shot.

He fumed.

"What was I thinking?!" Alucard groaned through his teeth, pulling himself into one of the many tombs he'd found throughout the castle.

In truth, he knew exactly what he'd been thinking. He'd overestimated his abilities. He'd fought a Belmont before, so very long ago. He'd overcome every challenge so far, and he'd gotten cocky. What's more, he had wanted to finish this quickly, and that eagerness had blinded him to Richter's abilities. It was a fool's call, a rookie mistake that he'd thought he'd long outgrown the capacity for.

The Belmont was just as strong, maybe even more so, as on the day he'd struck down Dracula.

Alucard sighed as he clambered into the coffin. He would rest for now, lick his wounds. And once he was recovered, he would find that girl, Maria. She seemed to know something that she hadn't let on before, and it was more imperative than ever that she tell him exactly what it was she knew, that she assist him any way she could. But even that wouldn't be enough. There would be nothing she could say to Alucard that would close that gap between his skills and Richter's.

For that to happen, Alucard would need to push himself. He needed to be faster, stronger. The only way that was going to happen was going to be by pitting himself against the legions of the castle, by besting stronger opponents than the ones he'd already overcome. There had been some relics that had unlocked some of his latent powers as well. With luck, he would find more of them, and that might give him that last bit of extra edge that he needed to win.

He'd been overconfident this time, and had paid the price.

But, if Richter wanted a worthy opponent, then with God as his witness, Alucard was going to make sure he would be that worthy opponent.

No one else was rising up to do it. Maria had to be tough to survive this Castle by herself as she had been doing, but Alucard honestly couldn't envision her being of much help against Richter. The Belmont was like her big brother, after all. Alucard would never ask a lady to strike her brother, blood relation or not. He would have to face Richter again, and he would have to do so alone.

With that thought repeating in his head, Alucard sealed the coffin, and prepared to rest and recover. He would awaken in a few hours, refreshed and recuperated for the search for Maria.

Next time, he'd be ready.

And next time, the Belmont wouldn't see it coming.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Lelygax on February 23, 2016, 10:26:34 PM
Getting away from Shaft's INTENT, would we agree that, sans a Dracula resurrection, the Castle would accept a corrupted Richter as Dark Lord?

Nope, because a Dark Lord already exists and its named Dracula with a dark priest clearly desiring for his ressurection, while controlling Richter Belmont. What Richter says while being controlled? That he wants Dracula to be revived so the battle can last for eternity!

Even if he wasn't being controlled (what contradicts the game) it wouldn't be his true desire to be evil and at the moment that Dracula ressurects, it is the same that ressurecting the actual Dark Lord so there is no room to a new one. After 1999 anyone can become a Dark Lord because Dracula is dead and his reincarnation doesn't want to be the new Dark Lord.

Lets not forget that Castlevania isn't a simple building and seems to be kinda sentient, since it is loyal to Dracula unless he doesn't desire to rule it. In Portrait of Ruin if I understood it right, it was the castle that resurrected Dracula and not Brauner.

You can then ask "Why then in Symphony of the Night or Harmony of Dissonance it didn't happened and Dracula appeared instantly?"and I think that it is because someone was already doing something about it (Shaft) or interfering in some way (Maxim).

Also in SotN the normal castle can even be some crazy Shaft's magic and the true castle is the inverted one, who knows? XD

Levelling up isn't a canon set of events though.

Things like Alucard acquiring his abilities and even certain specific weapons or key items such as relic, holy glasses etc is.

There's no true indication of how levelled up one can get, if at all.

Of course if the game is longer and you get the better ending then presumably your warrior would be more skilled.

Yeah, I also think that leveling up isn't canon, key items and some relics are.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: zangetsu468 on February 23, 2016, 11:47:19 PM
Your prose was interesting but I doubt this is "more or less exactly" how things went down, Bloody Rayne.

Although SOTN is a canon entry it requires plenty of assumptions in terms of exactly which events are canon and which aren't.

In terms of Alucard facing Richter, it's more than likely that Maria just happened to walk in at the moment he shattered Shaft's Orb. Occam's razor prevails.
Canonically relics, skills and armour, weapons etc give Alucard different attributes and abilities, immunity and so forth.
The way the game is designed with leveling up has nothing do with Alucard accessing the throne room asap and getting obliterated by Richter. (There are people who have speedrun the game with Alucard alone and skipped as many things as a Richter/ Maria run). The saving grace here is the final conversation with Maria and acquiring the holy glasses. This event had to be canon in order for Alucard to free Richter from Shaft's influence. Therefore everything Alucard had to do prior to this must be canon (glitching also does not exclude canon events).

Other issues such as optional bosses imo depend on the situation, if that boss is Death for example (instances of written text) then yes, if not then perhaps it happened but it's not relevant. (the sort of thing that would be left out if made into a narrative).
Having said that, the ending does change dependent on castle exploration percentage, therefore, the argument can be made that defeating optional bosses in SOTN are canon.

The next issue is the SS version being the more complete version. Not such a big issue because these areas are optional, but it can't be determined whether or not they affect the canon. I would argue that more complete versions of games perhaps should be considered canon, much like Dracula X Chronicles has now been considered to have replaced ROB.

If we take DXC as canon then the argument can be put forth that DXC Dracula form 3 (the canon final form) is much stronger than SOTN Dracula. If Richter (and Maria, even) jointly defeated DXC Dracula (according to SOTN's intro/ final stage 'bloodlines'/ROB) then canonically he should easily be able to kill Alucard. Alucard was much weaker but in the canon set of events he only had to use the Holy Goggles and destroy Shaft's invisible Orb, which is not the same thing as defeating Richter.
This is why I believe that skills etc can be acquired but strengths are static. Leveling up is a way of keeping the player bound to certain zones within the game and to assist in traversing the areas presented. Nothing more, nothing less. 

Save points need not be justified because in SOTN's context they're self-explanatory, Alucard rejuvinates vitality when sleeping in coffins.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Lumi Kløvstad on February 24, 2016, 12:18:55 AM
Lets not forget that Castlevania isn't a simple building and seems to be kinda sentient, since it is loyal to Dracula unless he doesn't desire to rule it. In Portrait of Ruin if I understood it right, it was the castle that resurrected Dracula and not Brauner.

Death does it. He even says so after he kills Brauner. The castle is oddly passive in all appearances, its only real ability seeming to be resurrecting along with Dracula and being some sort of location where evil spirits gather (very likely both traits cause each other in a metaphysical paradox).

Nope, because a Dark Lord already exists and its named Dracula

Who is dead and in no condition to affect ANYTHING at the time.

with a dark priest clearly desiring for his ressurection, while controlling Richter Belmont.

Shaft never says he's outright controlling Richter. He admits to influencing, which is easy enough and he probably could have done so without magic (never underestimate an evil psychiatrist) but he was never in 1 to 1 control of Richter's actions -- Shaft may be powerful and talented but in order to assume direct control of every little thing a man does requires that all your attention be paid to that man unless he just kind of stows Richter in a cupboard when he's not using him. If you aren't paying attention to your remote control car, you're not controlling it and it will crash.

Shaft would only do what was needed to ensure Richter stayed the course and remained under the effects of indoctrination, but would have left him a certain degree of autonomy so he could focus on other designs. Furthermore, Shaft is not Richter, and doesn't have Richter's skills. To assume direct 1 to 1 command of Richter's actions would compromise his usefulness as Shaft would never be able to control Richter as effectively in a fight as Richter could himself.

Again, you guys LOVE to see patterns where none need exist; Richter isn't being directly controlled because he doesn't have to be. Why directly control when simply influencing them will do just as well or better? Shaft isn't going to spring for the most resource and time-intensive method if he doesn't have to.

All of the rationale that Richter gives Alucard was Richter talking -- Shaft didn't make him say a word of it. Richter was in control, but that isn't to say he was in his right mind; he definitely wasn't. His decision making and reasoning has clearly been compromised, but Shaft is a tactical thinker and he doesn't have the benefit of his cult anymore. He's doing all of this more or less by himself. Ghost or not, in order to revive Dracula AND keep Richter under control, this demands he divide his attention, so giving Richter as much autonomy as possible makes perfect logical and tactical sense. Meatpuppeting the Belmont (dibs on that as a band name, btw) makes absolutely zero sense as it leaves Shaft no capacity to actually revive Dracula.

Ironically, the only instance in which turning Richter into a remotely controlled puppet benefits Shaft is if my theory is correct, and he decides late in his plan to simply make Richter the new Dark Lord.

I also think that leveling up isn't canon, key items and some relics are.

DID NOBODY READ MY POST ON THIS?!

Occam's razor prevails.

Occam's Razor: "Entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily."

A metaphysical expression meant to discuss whether God could be proven by reason alone, and has little if anything to do on the concept of Gameplay and Story Segregation (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/GameplayAndStorySegregation), which the save points would fall under.

Where in my prose statement do I say specifically that Alucard kills Richter? I didn't.

You assumed that because of how I posit Alucard's thought processes, but the simple fact is canonically he DOES find Maria, and she DOES assist him by giving him information and the Holy Glasses. He DOES save Richter, but there's no way he could have known any of that was going to happen before he finds her. I don't contradict ANY of that. The prose simply argues that Alucard faces Richter initially and gets whipped to zero health (pretty much everyone does this on their first playthrough as well, which tells me the devs meant this to happen). In gameplay, this is a Game Over Screen. In canon, Alucard would retreat, realizing he made a boo-boo and is epically outclassed. In gameplay, he saves his progress by stepping into a coffin (a room containing a coffin being a "tomb" irl). In canon, he'd find such a (empty and devoid of enemies) tomb and stay there while he heals, which is what I portray.

The Razor doesn't shave off jack because there's not really anything to shave off in my statement; all I have explained is the most probable manner in which gameplay and story are desegregated.

Is my statement forever entrenched in canon? Of course not. I wouldn't dream of it. But canon would resemble it strongly. Alucard doesn't level up, but he does become more skilled. He does become stronger by exercising, and pitched combat against tough foes is one hell of an exercise like no other on Earth. He does gather more relics on his way to meet Maria, and these do expand his abilities.

You argued earlier about Richter's strength and skill trumping Alucard's yet somehow Alucard prevailed.

I illustrated the means by which that statement is true.

We are not actually arguing.

In any case, Richter being influenced, not possessed (for reasons I have already clearly stated enough times I have lost count) would mean that he'd be just as capable of doing horrific things to become a Dark Lord, and be considered culpable. Furthermore, once Shaft's orb is destroyed, and that negative reinforcement stopped, Richter would be aware of that. He'd realize what he was about to do (actually, he did realize it. Pretty much immediately. Hence his "OH MY GOD WHAT HAVE I DONE") and that shame would follow him to the grave. He wouldn't feel that guilty if he'd been possessed because he wouldn't have been in control of his actions. He'd feel a lot of emotions, but shame wouldn't really be one of them. Rage, definitely. Fear of it happening again? Absolutely. Resolve to prevent it from happening again? Certifiably. Shame? Given what we know of Richter's untampered psyche, more than likely not.

But these are things he chose. He had agency in these decisions. He wasn't entirely sane, but temporary insanity is a real thing and it's a bitch to deal with the aftermath of, because however compromised you were when you made the choices you did, you still made those choices. No one forced you to make them.

The shame and the guilt of that would eat away at Richter, and easily provoke a "what have I done" the moment he regained his lucidity.

Rather like Dracula would also do at the end of the game.

But you've all read my topic on that as well.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: zangetsu468 on February 24, 2016, 01:35:11 AM
Again, you guys LOVE to see patterns where none need exist; Richter isn't being directly controlled because he doesn't have to be. Why directly control when simply influencing them will do just as well or better? Shaft isn't going to spring for the most resource and time-intensive method if he doesn't have to.

http://nichegamer.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/timeline-side2.jpg (http://nichegamer.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/timeline-side2.jpg)

He didn't. The official timeline stated that Shaft's curse seeped into Richter's heart, left defenseless from his battle with Dracula.

Webster's full definition of 'curse' (in this context):
a prayer or invocation for harm or injury to come upon one

More information on curses found here: http://www.occultopedia.com/c/curse.htm (http://www.occultopedia.com/c/curse.htm)

Specifically, a curse is placed so that some form of misfortune will come upon said targeted individual(s). It goes onto explain that curses were often used as explanations for misfortunes relating to/ of specific people/ locations.

That's the entire point of Shaft's curse to begin with. It's using/ invoking his supernatural power to target Richter in the sense of manifesting misfortune. How? By subjecting him to make all of the decisions to be the Lord of Castle 1 and try to resurrect Dracula. (making the battle last for eternity) 
I think I know what you're trying to say with the fact Richter was consciously making his decisions etc, but honestly it doesn't matter because he was cursed, the same way Soleiyu was "brainwashed" by Dracula and fought his father. Of course he was "awake" in the physical sense but the behaviour speaks for itself. Except that in this case Shaft's curse seeped into his heart so that he could basically control Richter rather than 1 simple "brainwash" which has failed before. 

If I'm wrong then why when Alucard smashed the orb, does Shaft cry out in anguish and then state that they're too late?
There are also a bunch of similar looking orbs in the last battle with Shaft. One was hovering above Richter which denotes shafts power over him, as soon as the orb went Richter reverts to normal again.

Castlevania has never been really deep with story, the curse is a plot point to involve a Belmont character in the game making the protagonist the antagonist and adding reasoning behind Alucard being the protagonist with the canon absence of a Belmont hero.

You argued earlier about Richter's strength and skill trumping Alucard's yet somehow Alucard prevailed.

He prevailed because he didn't need to defeat Richter, he only needed to shatter the orb.
How hard is it to shatter a discoball vs picking a fight with Tyson (in his prime) and winning? I'd say not very.

We are not actually arguing.

I know, I also didn't take it that way.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Lelygax on February 24, 2016, 02:01:46 AM
Death does it. He even says so after he kills Brauner. The castle is oddly passive in all appearances, its only real ability seeming to be resurrecting along with Dracula and being some sort of location where evil spirits gather (very likely both traits cause each other in a metaphysical paradox).


At 3:00. It is totally ambiguous since he says that the throne room is needed, but its not mentioned anywhere that Death revived Dracula and instead they mention that Death wants he being able to revived (like all of his followers and servants)

Who is dead and in no condition to affect ANYTHING at the time.

He couldn't do anything while dead, sure, but his actions while alive already did a lot. He returns every 100 years we wanting or not, naturally or by someone hands AND can be ressurected even earlier if someone interferes with his full power cycle. So yeah, indirectly someone would oppose this (Death being no. 1 for that).


Shaft never says he's outright controlling Richter. He admits to influencing, which is easy enough and he probably could have done so without magic (never underestimate an evil psychiatrist) but he was never in 1 to 1 control of Richter's actions -- Shaft may be powerful and talented but in order to assume direct control of every little thing a man does requires that all your attention be paid to that man unless he just kind of stows Richter in a cupboard when he's not using him. If you aren't paying attention to your remote control car, you're not controlling it and it will crash.

Shaft would only do what was needed to ensure Richter stayed the course and remained under the effects of indoctrination, but would have left him a certain degree of autonomy so he could focus on other designs. Furthermore, Shaft is not Richter, and doesn't have Richter's skills. To assume direct 1 to 1 command of Richter's actions would compromise his usefulness as Shaft would never be able to control Richter as effectively in a fight as Richter could himself.

Again, you guys LOVE to see patterns where none need exist; Richter isn't being directly controlled because he doesn't have to be. Why directly control when simply influencing them will do just as well or better? Shaft isn't going to spring for the most resource and time-intensive method if he doesn't have to.

All of the rationale that Richter gives Alucard was Richter talking -- Shaft didn't make him say a word of it. Richter was in control, but that isn't to say he was in his right mind; he definitely wasn't. His decision making and reasoning has clearly been compromised, but Shaft is a tactical thinker and he doesn't have the benefit of his cult anymore. He's doing all of this more or less by himself. Ghost or not, in order to revive Dracula AND keep Richter under control, this demands he divide his attention, so giving Richter as much autonomy as possible makes perfect logical and tactical sense. Meatpuppeting the Belmont (dibs on that as a band name, btw) makes absolutely zero sense as it leaves Shaft no capacity to actually revive Dracula.

I see the problem now, when I say controlling I doesn't mean Shaft commanding him to walk or use the toilet (lol). He was controlling him to be "bad" and protect this castle, while thinking that its totally normal and he wasn't even being controlled. Take your time to read my post and you will notice that I've never said anything about direct control or 1:1, I've said that he was being controlled (and if you want, he COULD be direct controlled by Shaft since he doesnt even had a body anymore or anything to do, but I don't think it is what happened, also Death could prepare things for Dracula ressurection since they even already had all body parts) and thats all, meaning that he isn't suitable as a Dark Lord since he wouldn't do these things if not by Shaft's control.

Ironically, the only instance in which turning Richter into a remotely controlled puppet benefits Shaft is if my theory is correct, and he decides late in his plan to simply make Richter the new Dark Lord.

I don't see how this would be the only instance for this since it would deviate even more from being a Dark Lord. He would be even less prone to acting as himself and making his own decisions like you said, he wouldn't be truly evil.

Now I'm trying to imagine a Dark Lord that can't do anything because his holy whip and weapons are... holy? And being all "darky" makes you weak to holy things. You would be removing almost all of strong Belmont traits to make him in a barebone guy with weaker weapons.  :-\


DID NOBODY READ MY POST ON THIS?!

I did and that is the problem, you wrote some fanfiction/prose and expect us to argue while treating it as evidence. It not bad writing, but still isn't in the game also. I'm misunderstanding it and you only want a opinion if I like your story? I'm telling you what I see that would fit in the game while using things shown in all games that I can remember at the moment, not taking it as an adaptation of SotN story to fill the gaps in narration.

The shame and the guilt of that would eat away at Richter, and easily provoke a "what have I done" the moment he regained his lucidity.

Rather like Dracula would also do at the end of the game.

But you've all read my topic on that as well.

It is different to compare someone that did all of these kinds because he wanted (Dracula) with someone that clearly didn't (Richter).

Sorry if it sounds like I'm being a little blunt or we have some kind of misunderstanding here.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Lumi Kløvstad on February 24, 2016, 03:03:12 AM
I work with magic every day irl. I know what a curse is, and why it's a thing that shouldn't ever be done. These things seep both ways, and Shaft never figured this out before he was oblivionated.

As for holy relics in the hands of a dark lord, anything holy can be corrupted, especially if, like the Vampire Killer, they've been tied to the darkness in some way since day one.

Richter's stuff would have ceased to be holy, but it would lose none of its potency. Hell, the corruption and subversion of holy stuff is practically a hobby for every Christian demon out there.

Just saying.

As for my prose, I wasn't asking anyone to take that stream of events as canon. However, agree that a canon event, disregarding strict gameplay and instead boiling the gameplay down to a purely story narrative, it would have resembled that a hell of a lot more than "Alucard reached level 60".

He's not leveling up. He's bludgeoning Mermen, Skeletons, Axe Armors, and whatever else to death and seeking stronger opponents to hone his skills. That's what real life leveling is: practice and the constant pushing one's personal boundaries. The way everyone is wording things, it sounds as if you 're completely denying that Alucard is even capable of growing in strength conventionally in the way that literally anything that has ever had muscles has been able to do. Of course Alucard doesn't magically find himself with higher strength or endurance after a sequential kill, or respawn back in time back at the last coffin he took a nap in. That would be silly, and we can all agree that it's merely an anti-frustration gameplay measure. But he probably took a nap in a coffin while he rested (unless he found a comfy looking bed minus the demons, but that's Juste's deal really), and it would be in a room uninhabited by enemies. His muscle mass at the end of the game would be markedly higher than it was at the beginning. That much should be obvious. He may be half-vampire, but he's not a corpse. So, in game, Alucard gets sent to a game over screen when he runs out of HP (aka: his body has reached its limit). In-universe reality: Alucard retreats and lives to fight another day. The sequencing in my prose was never meant to be the point: the point is to portray a "reality ensues" bit whereby we see events as Alucard does, not a gamer.

It's not evidence.

It's a reminder of the narrative we're working within.

Also, a mod totally needs to split this topic something FIERCE because we stopped talking about the actual topic PAGES ago and I would really love this thread back on track.

Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: zangetsu468 on February 24, 2016, 06:11:11 AM
This is where I don't agree, in Alucard's reality there is no "game over" because he doesn't falter, get defeated or die unless it's part of the game's narrative. Assuming in a narrative sense that someone loses and retreats is irrational.(especially in SOTN with the Game Over screen clearly showing the bones of what is thought to be Alucard's demonic form). It's the reason why in FFVII you had Phoenix Downs, but why in FFVII Advent Children there were no Phoenix Downs used; nobody died (or got "game over"). It doesn't work in a narrative sense unless you're OOT Link entering the Hero's Downfall Timeline (which is an extrely isolated scenario that most would agree Nintendo shoehorned to make Zelda's universe seem more cohesive.)

I'm sorry if I sound negative because it's not intended this way but I must agree with Lely about his opinions and sentiments re: the prose. Fan fiction is often lovely but it's not well placed here.

I also disagree that he's fighting mermen and lesser demons to home his skill for the following reasons:
- Dude wakes up after 300 years of sleep looking fresh as fuck
- Runs through the forest, outruns birds on his way
- Storms into the castle and beats the bridge
- Gives Death the middle finger (abridged version)
Suffice to say if it were real life the mermen may just recoil in fear after the first hundred are cut down.

Back on track to the Dark Lord quota, I don't see any reason Richter couldn't have been the sacrifice. Yes he's holy and wields the VK, but it doesn't mean he can't use his holy weapon and abilities for evil. Dracula gaining dominance over the Belmonts also ends the bloodline and means that there's no direct heir to the VK.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Lelygax on February 24, 2016, 06:19:19 AM
I agree with you at the coffin part, he indeed took a nap at least one time, since he fought Succubus. I disagree about the "insert training scene here" because he didn't lost any battle in this game and didn't had time to train since it seems that the game happens in less than 24 hours. I understand and isn't ignoring the fact that anyone would get more experienced at doing something while doing it and all but something urgent was happening at the time.

I don't see the need to split this topic since all of my replies were about a Dark Lord and why I think that someone couldn't be one, but if you want you can create a new thread for these other topics so we can speak more freely :)

I'm with you, lets put this thread on rails again and get back on track.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: theplottwist on February 24, 2016, 07:52:51 AM
Damn, why these epic arguments happen when I'm not around.

Shaft never says he's outright controlling Richter. He admits to influencing, which is easy enough and he probably could have done so without magic (never underestimate an evil psychiatrist) but he was never in 1 to 1 control of Richter's actions -- Shaft may be powerful and talented but in order to assume direct control of every little thing a man does requires that all your attention be paid to that man unless he just kind of stows Richter in a cupboard when he's not using him. If you aren't paying attention to your remote control car, you're not controlling it and it will crash.

OK, I know this was argued already but Shaft DID admit to controlling Richter. There is no mention of "influencing" but there is outright "controlling" mentioned:

(http://i.imgur.com/IcUMkew.png)
(http://i.imgur.com/W3GntM2.png)
From SotN in english.

(http://i.imgur.com/PqnrHU3.png)
(http://i.imgur.com/wIU2dSp.png)
From the Retranslated version.

Quote
Shaft would only do what was needed to ensure Richter stayed the course and remained under the effects of indoctrination, but would have left him a certain degree of autonomy so he could focus on other designs. Furthermore, Shaft is not Richter, and doesn't have Richter's skills. To assume direct 1 to 1 command of Richter's actions would compromise his usefulness as Shaft would never be able to control Richter as effectively in a fight as Richter could himself.

I believe this kinda responds itself. Shaft could control him for everything else, but for fighting leave his mind to work alone.

Richter fully admits to be carrying on a ritual to bring Dracula back "so the battle can last for eternity!" and, if you have the Holy Glasses equipped before you enter his room, Alucard suspects that this is a very out-of-place thing for him to say.

Richter is being controlled, and I suspect we've been talking to Shaft all along before the orb is shattered. He's carrying on the ritual through Richter.

Also, you said Richter being controlled in battle means that he'll fight like shit because Shaft doesn't know how to fight like him: This is the PERFECT explanation for how Alucard survived long enough to shatter the orb - Richter was fighting like crap.

Quote
Again, you guys LOVE to see patterns where none need exist; Richter isn't being directly controlled because he doesn't have to be.

No one is "seeing patterns". As I have shown above, it's stated plain as day that Richter is being controlled.

Quote
Meatpuppeting the Belmont (dibs on that as a band name, btw) makes absolutely zero sense as it leaves Shaft no capacity to actually revive Dracula.

Unless, as I said above and Richter's dialogue confirms, Shaft is conducting the ritual using Richter's hands. "He" admits to be  doing it to revive Dracula, not for any other reason.

(http://i.imgur.com/7hIjt7p.png)

From the PSP version. He says the exact same thing in all three versions.

Quote
A metaphysical expression meant to discuss whether God could be proven by reason alone, and has little if anything to do on the concept of Gameplay and Story Segregation, which the save points would fall under.

Occam's Razor is applied to every instance of inferential reasoning. It's a key piece of critical thinking and skeptcism. Can be applied to God claims, can be applied to stories and their mechanics.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Lumi Kløvstad on February 24, 2016, 12:53:44 PM
PlotTwist, they happened at about 3 AM my time, so that's probably why. I stay up a lot of late nights.

Shifting gears off of Richter Belmont in this thread (forever and ever), I want to talk a little about Gabriel Belmont and HIS Castle, as the process of mastery of said Castle seems to be almost the same from what few details we can gather about both castles.

Castlevania is only suggested as being sentient. We do know it's clearly alive (there's far too much evidence to support that and even I would never dispute it), but the structure itself is portrayed oddly in terms of its loyalties.

(Also: I am discussing the loyalties of a predominantly stone and wooden structure to an undead man. There go my chances of ever being the star of a collegiate debate team.)

The Castle in Lords 2 overwhelmingly states its bunny-boiler-level loyalty to Dracul, to the level that it will actively attempt to murder anybody seen helping him attempt to seperate himself from the Castle. But Castlevania does not -- it even obeys the will of several others at times when Dracula is sealed/indisposed. It leaves me wondering just how "loyal" the main Castle is to a given Dark Lord.

Further postulation: is commanding the Castle necessarily a prerequisite for becoming the Dark Lord?
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: theplottwist on February 24, 2016, 01:05:40 PM
OK so, by what I understand from Dracula's Castle:

Dracula's Castle is a manifestation of Dracula's power and symbol of it. It was built by Dracula himself, as per the japanese manual of Castlevania Adventure. And as we know, the castle's existence is powered by chaos.

Now, Dracula having built it, I do not believe ownership of the castle -- as a structure -- is needed to assert one's position as the Dark Lord.

HOWEVER, the castle is not a simple structure - it is deeply connected to Chaos. Shouldering chaos' forces IS needed if one wishes to succeed Dracula's position. This is stated in the light novel.

So, the final conclusion: If one wishes to become the Dark Lord, he needs to control chaos. And it seems that taking over Dracula's Castle is the easiest path to do so, thought not the only one.

The pathway to chaos inside the castle appears to be the only pathway in existence. However, as Dmitrii states, one doesn't need to have inherited anything from Dracula. They only need to control the forces of chaos -- and those would be the demons.

So, while one can become the Dark Lord by sitting on Dracula's throne -- as Death puts bluntly on the novel -- it appears that there are alternatives, though I think this would be a much preferred method.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Lumi Kløvstad on February 24, 2016, 01:47:14 PM
Hmmm.

I'll grant that the passage to Chaos seen in the Castle is the only one known, but there are probably others. I'd imagine they'd crop up in places where misery and evil became concentrated, like in Auchwitz or Poveiglia Island.

Kudos if you know about Poveiglia Island without googling it.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: theplottwist on February 24, 2016, 01:57:25 PM
Another thing I'd like to add to your point of there being "other pathways":

The castle of DoS is a replica of Dracula's Castle in that it's existence is powered by a stream of negative energy coming from the Abyss, which is not Chaos. It's a replica in the "ingredients used to build" sense, and not in the "structure" sense -- though you can identify structural similarities.

So, while it's not a pathway to Chaos, it is a pathway to somewhere where great amounts of dark energy comes from. This goes to show that a "demon castle" doesn't necessarily need to be powered by THE chaos contained in Dracula's Castle.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Lelygax on February 25, 2016, 08:56:28 AM
The novel says that chaos is what gives energy for Dracula and monsters, also creating them, not that Dracula controls chaos. Controlling chaos is what Olrox wanted to do.

About entrances to chaos, Castlevania allows it because its a "spiritual world" as said by Arikado and a stream of chaos exist, maybe sending energy to the castle and Dracula, as shown here:


So we can deduce that its impossible to reach chaos without a similar spiritual world, this place also needs to already be connected to chaos and you will need to be allowed. If I understood it right it was only possible to Soma reach chaos because Castlevania is a reflection of Dracula's spirit (Harmony of Dissonance and the novel only implies even more that it reflects the soul or will of who invokes it) that was connected by chaos already. So if we think this way, anyone, anywhere, can reach chaos spiritually (maybe meditating?).

Death could traverse to chaos physically like Soma could in Castlevania and recharge his batteries because well... Its fucking Death, he can traverse through dimensions and the spiritual world easily since its part of his job.

So in the end its like plottwist said, you can't reach chaos, but you can reach similar places that gives you a lot of dark energy that in the end comes from chaos anyway. Its like buying a PS4 on Walmart, you got one PS4 made by Sony, but not directly at Sony.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: theplottwist on February 25, 2016, 11:29:19 AM
Quote
About entrances to chaos, Castlevania allows it because its a "spiritual world" as said by Arikado and a stream of chaos exist, maybe sending energy to the castle and Dracula, as shown here:

So we can deduce that its impossible to reach chaos without a similar spiritual world, this place also needs to already be connected to chaos and you will need to be allowed. If I understood it right it was only possible to Soma reach chaos because Castlevania is a reflection of Dracula's spirit (Harmony of Dissonance and the novel only implies even more that it reflects the soul or will of who invokes it) that was connected by chaos already. So if we think this way, anyone, anywhere, can reach chaos spiritually (maybe meditating?).

OK I think you misunderstood this line.

Arikado's point is that the castle is made from Dracula's magic, which in turn comes from chaos -- therefore it is a spiritual world.

So, if it is made from chaos, then there is an entrance to chaos that feeds the castle's existence. The entrance to chaos is not because "it's a spiritual world" but because it is made from chaos which turns it into a spiritual world. It's the other way around.

Quote
Death could traverse to chaos physically like Soma could in Castlevania and recharge his batteries because well... Its fucking Death, he can traverse through dimensions and the spiritual world easily since its part of his job.

I'm thinking he doesn't need to "traverse". It's more like he's connected to it and the stream of energy is constant. Once he's defeated, as its said in the novel, his soul sinks into chaos to be reborn later when Dracula's return draws near.

Also, Death is not THE concept of death given enbodiment. Death is a creature born from the human-death portion of chaos (again explained in the novel) and is a Shinigami - he can get people to die, but he can't exactly kill you if you resist. Against THE concept of death as a natural ocurrence there is nothing you can do.

Just wanted to point these things out.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Lumi Kløvstad on February 25, 2016, 12:01:51 PM
Death in Castlevania is more like the villain from "The Frighteners". He's not ACTUALLY the grim reaper, he just styles himself like that for effect.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Lelygax on February 25, 2016, 02:22:26 PM
OK I think you misunderstood this line.

Arikado's point is that the castle is made from Dracula's magic, which in turn comes from chaos -- therefore it is a spiritual world.

Yes, I understood this, even so thanks. But it fueled by chaos doesn't automatically makes it a spiritual world. I think its because of Dracula's magic (we don't need to say again and again that Dracula's magic come from chaos right? xD) making a castle that should've crumbled thousand years ago back to "life" (Alucard says in SotN that it is a creature of chaos).Or you are trying to tell me that everything fueled by chaos only exists on the spiritual world?

So, if it is made from chaos, then there is an entrance to chaos that feeds the castle's existence. The entrance to chaos is not because "it's a spiritual world" but because it is made from chaos which turns it into a spiritual world. It's the other way around.

Except I think not. Yes its power comes from chaos, but before it passes by Dracula since Arikado says "This castle is a product of Dracula's magic." like you said before, if we take the entire conversation instead of line by line we can see that Soma doesn't go cut the connection of chaos with the castle, he goes cut the connection of chaos with his own soul. If by cutting the connection with the castle also cuts the connection with his soul it means that the castle is a reflection of his soul! :P

The meaning of only him being able to enter the chaos realm using the castle implies that only him can change his soul, like a symbolic thing. An explanation to why the castle is a "spiritual world" can be that the castle is also dead inside the eclipse, since Dracula is dead for good (I know this can sound crazy).

I'm thinking he doesn't need to "traverse". It's more like he's connected to it and the stream of energy is constant. Once he's defeated, as its said in the novel, his soul sinks into chaos to be reborn later when Dracula's return draws near.

Also, Death is not THE concept of death given enbodiment. Death is a creature born from the human-death portion of chaos (again explained in the novel) and is a Shinigami - he can get people to die, but he can't exactly kill you if you resist. Against THE concept of death as a natural ocurrence there is nothing you can do.

Just wanted to point these things out.

I know that Death isn't THE Death, even so it needs to bring these souls harvested to another place, since he is a shinigami. I was not exactly talking about when he is defeated, but about when he prepares before going to check the castle, what happened is that I remember it wrong, here is the correct part:

Quote
Death silently started moving towards the center of darkness.
He swore allegiance to his master in the distant past.
Now, he has to carry out his allegiance and in preparation for that, he allowed himself to fill up with darkness.

I was darkness, not chaos, woops :P
I wasn't saying that he needs to draw energy manually each time, I understood as if he was doing that to prepare himself for something extreme (that thankfully saved him later)

P.S: While a lot of people (including me) says that Death isn't THE Death, he implies otherwise near the end of the novel. But lets not think too much about that, at least not in this thread...

edit: citations from the novel (since mentioning but doesn't showing material doesn't helps much, its novel is huge after all)

 “Dracula’s castle, in other words is the embodiment of Dracula’s magic, a part of his soul and body, their belief in them being [fallen] and a part of [Genesis}.”

 “What have you misunderstood? I am Death. Human death only comprises a part of chaos..."
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: theplottwist on February 25, 2016, 03:41:09 PM
Quote
Except I think not. Yes its power comes from chaos, but before it passes by Dracula since Arikado says "This castle is a product of Dracula's magic." like you said before, if we take the entire conversation instead of line by line we can see that Soma doesn't go cut the connection of chaos with the castle, he goes cut the connection of chaos with his own soul. If by cutting the connection with the castle also cuts the connection with his soul it means that the castle is a reflection of his soul! :P

Sure, Soma went to cut himself off from chaos, but I don't believe the rest is correct. The castle is clearly shown to be an independent entity from Dracula. So much so that Dracula got separated from the castle in 1999 and the castle kept existing. It's existence doesn't depend on Dracula, it depends on chaos. Cutting Dracula's soul from chaos doesn't cut the castle from chaos.

When Soma cuts the connection between the "evil spirit" and chaos, the castle ceases existing not because "the connection between the castle and chaos was severed", it wasnt. It disappeared because it was resealed in the eclipse by members of the church. If you check the Library in Dawn of Sorrow, it says that the castle is still inside the eclipse waiting for a new master. In the novel, it says right at the beginning that it was resealed right after Soma cut the connection between himself and chaos.

TL;DR: The castle disappearing at the end of Aria is not a consequence of Soma cutting off the connection with chaos. It is simply the castle being resealed inside the eclipse.

Quote
edit: citations from the novel (since mentioning but doesn't showing material doesn't helps much, its novel is huge after all)

 “Dracula’s castle, in other words is the embodiment of Dracula’s magic, a part of his soul and body, their belief in them being [fallen] and a part of [Genesis}.”

 “What have you misunderstood? I am Death. Human death only comprises a part of chaos..."

OK, the first citation is not an explanation of what the castle is. It is explaining the belief held by Graham's cult that lead them to become a literal part of the Legion castle. They believed that, if the castle was whole again, THEN his body and soul would return (as Graham, no less) because their belief is that the castle is a part of his body and soul.

And we know they were wrong -- Aria proves it by showing that even with the castle back, Dracula's "body and soul" are not. They exist as separate entities. EVEN THOUGH I agree that the castle is a manifestation of Dracula's magic and is a reflection of his will (and maybe his soul too, why not), I do not agree the castle is "part of his soul" as in "it depends on Dracula's soul to exist". It does not. The castle was separated from Dracula before, and it still existed just fine.

The complete quote:

(click to show/hide)

The second quote, about Death, doesn't imply Death is the embodiment of the concept of death of all things. It implies Death was born from the "human death" part that comprises part of chaos. Like "Paranoia" was probably born out of the "human paranoia" part that comprises chaos.

This explains why Death intends on influencing humans towards death (as a Shinigami does in japanese culture), and not that Death is death as the natural concept.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Lelygax on February 25, 2016, 06:21:33 PM
Sure, Soma went to cut himself off from chaos, but I don't believe the rest is correct. The castle is clearly shown to be an independent entity from Dracula. So much so that Dracula got separated from the castle in 1999 and the castle kept existing. It's existence doesn't depend on Dracula, it depends on chaos. Cutting Dracula's soul from chaos doesn't cut the castle from chaos.

When Soma cuts the connection between the "evil spirit" and chaos, the castle ceases existing not because "the connection between the castle and chaos was severed", it wasnt. It disappeared because it was resealed in the eclipse by members of the church. If you check the Library in Dawn of Sorrow, it says that the castle is still inside the eclipse waiting for a new master. In the novel, it says right at the beginning that it was resealed right after Soma cut the connection between himself and chaos.

TL;DR: The castle disappearing at the end of Aria is not a consequence of Soma cutting off the connection with chaos. It is simply the castle being resealed inside the eclipse.

We don't know if the castle crumbled or not at 1999 when he lost his connection with the castle, he could've emerged again inside the eclipse at 2035 like it always does. Also it doesn't depend on Dracula, but depends on Dracula's magic that yes, come from chaos. It seems that Dracula's magic was in Castlevania all these years, we can see that on Aria throne's room dialogue with Arikado, also Graham uses it before us.

I know that Castlevania was never truly destroyed at Aria's ending, but it is a consequence of Soma cutting off the connection and also because the eclipse ended, no need to seal again something that stills sealed. Now I really don't know if Dracula's magic returned to the castle or not after that, or if the castle started to drawn energy directly from chaos from this point on. Surely you can also be right and the castle drawn energy from chaos directly, after Dracula's death.

Even so I see cutting something from chaos as the same of cutting a wire, you can still connect it together again. Thats why I really think that Soma cut Castlevania and his soul from chaos, someone could easily "turn ON" the castle again with a ritual, but it would be still needed to wait an eclipse and it would be inside the eclipse yet.


OK, the first citation is not an explanation of what the castle is. It is explaining the belief held by Graham's cult that lead them to become a literal part of the Legion castle. They believed that, if the castle was whole again, THEN his body and soul would return (as Graham, no less) because their belief is that the castle is a part of his body and soul.

And we know they were wrong -- Aria proves it by showing that even with the castle back, Dracula's "body and soul" are not. They exist as separate entities. EVEN THOUGH I agree that the castle is a manifestation of Dracula's magic and is a reflection of his will (and maybe his soul too, why not), I do not agree the castle is "part of his soul" as in "it depends on Dracula's soul to exist". It does not. The castle was separated from Dracula before, and it still existed just fine.

The complete quote:

(click to show/hide)

The second quote, about Death, doesn't imply Death is the embodiment of the concept of death of all things. It implies Death was born from the "human death" part that comprises part of chaos. Like "Paranoia" was probably born out of the "human paranoia" part that comprises chaos.

This explains why Death intends on influencing humans towards death (as a Shinigami does in japanese culture), and not that Death is death as the natural concept.

Text with "" is spoken by someone, that someone being Olrox, before that it was being really explained only their belief, when Olrox started talking he said the definition of the castle and their belief. Surely it was been proved that Dracula isn't needed anymore to Castlevania exist, and that is exactly why he says that it is a part of his soul and body.

Its highly implied in Aria that Soma isn't whole until he absorbed Dracula's magic from the castle. So it can be a example.

About Death, like I said before I don't think it too, but I know what it implied on the text and it wasn't really it, not at this moment. They could've wrote "god of death/shinigami" like before. He said "Human death" because he was explaining to someone about a certain someone death, chaos come from humans alone and they say human a lot in this novel. It seems to me that Death isn't the "death concept", but really is a embodiment of the concept.

A concept doesn't really need a body to exist, so even if you destroy it, it will still happen, like Paranoia. Its really deep man, thanks for opening my mind even more. That's why I love these debates and conversations. Because if we agree we learn, but even if we disagree we can open more our minds. :)

I think I don't need to say, but these and future posts are only my opinion.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: Flame on March 06, 2016, 11:14:52 PM
Id just like to interject and say that gameplay and story need not be exclusive to each other, as far as SotN goes. Death Samus-ing Alucard's gear at the beginning is justification for you to go into the castle unarmed. at which point Alucard has to make do with the stuff in the castle. he also doesnt start with the mist or wolf or bat form, which storywise, could be attributed to just being rusty and having to shake the cobwebs off and relearn it before he fights richter, or he'll get creamed, since he just came out of a really long slumber and Richter is fresh as a cucumber right off of only recently having stormed Castlevania and killed Dracula. And has that nifty ability of making it rain holy water. So the idea of Alucard needing to level up before fighting Richter, so far as Gameplay/story goes, doesnt need to be seperate.

just my 2 cents. It's 2 am right now. Which is making this not make sense anymore.
Title: Re: What marks a person as a Dark Lord Candidate?
Post by: X on March 08, 2016, 06:06:19 PM
Quote
We don't know if the castle crumbled or not at 1999

We kinda do actually. IGA stated in an interview (correct me if I'm wrong here) that the castle in 1999 is the exact same castle in AoS. It was not destroyed but sealed away in the eclipse. So in a sense we get to see that same castle in AoS that was around during 1999.