Or that he starts off with a 'clean slate' upon each resurrection thus resulting in such sentiments being removed entirely.
2.Yeah, no shit. We all know what happened with Alucard. It was stated in SotN, as everybody recalls. But what happened to Sypha and Grant? How can you make a direct sequel, a good one at least, and not even describe what happened to the core characters that the sequel is based on? This could have been a sequel to any other Castlevania game.
According to Judgment, Grant was busy rebuilding Wallachia/Transylvania.
3.He's a time traveler. He should have already knew the outcome. And Death tried to resurrect Dracula in HoD too
Time is hardly a straight line.
St.Germain, after fighting Hector said "I feel a new destiny flowing out of you..." implying that originally Hector was going to be used as a vessel and that nobody would be there who could honestly stop him. However, likely through the minor influence of St.Germain a new chain of events was enacted.
Hmmm....that's funny. In all the other games where Dracula was resurrected, he never needed a vessel.
Vessel, sacrifice, borrowed energy, etc.
He needs to use someone elses life force in some way or another.
5.I don't care what you say. Iga fucked the story line up by having others besides Belmonts be able to defeat Dracula. It's like somebody other than Link defeat Ganon, using a weapon other than the Master Sword.
Bloodlines was pre-IGA and had John Morris killing Drac with the VK, and before that Quincy Morris killing him with a
stake.
It wasn't IGA that began that trend, and at least Iga has maintained some kind of consistency in Dracula's defeat. Besides, would you honestly rather play the same damn character with the same damn weapon
every single game?
At least by utilizing other, non-belmonts, we've gotten a bit more variety in playstyles; Souls, Glyphs, Alucard, etc.