Topic: NITM is still better than SOTN!

[Profbeanburrito]

In Reply To #30

Boo Hoo! Cry about it some more...

"I'm sorry sir, we can't give you another loan"

[Aridale]

In Reply To #30

maybe because women typically take the last name of the husbands? And because theres almost no chance in hell that in that time and age her husband woulda took hers or left hers unchanged

[DragonSlayr81]

The sexism card is just as annoying as the race card. And a lot of time, they always seem to be played in the wrong oppertunities.

[darkwzrd4]

The only mildly interesting thing in NitM that SotN didn't have is playing as the massively overpowered Maria Renard.  I can see why many people don't like how she is, but I thought that her special moves were cool but overpowered.  Also, I didn't like the moves she had in the PSP version of SotN.  they seemed a little childish.  They were the same moves as RoB when she was 12 years old.  I know that she is only 5 years older in SotN and NitM, but I would think that she would have more adult moves at that time.  Older animals don't equal more adult moves.  As I said before, I thought the moves she had in NitM were cool but overpowered. 
To be honest, what I think would be cool is if a she got her own game that shows exactly what she went though while searching for Richter.  As it is said, she had been searching for him for a whole year before she met Alucard in the castle.  I know that it is a long shot but I really think that it would be kind of cool if done right.  Also, it would give the series another with a female protagonist aside from OoE which had Shanoa.

[A n t r a x x]

To be honest, what I think would be cool is if a she got her own game that shows exactly what she went though while searching for Richter.

[uzo]

Wow. Are you for real, Seaner? There is a limit to how much garbage you can spew.

wtf you mean she wouldn't be able to pass on the Belmont name?  wtf.  you sound sexist too.

Pro tip; women don't pass on family names, especially in the pre 1950's. Fact of life, live with it, you day dreaming equality hippie slob.

[Saner]

oh yeah well how about Sonia became a Belmont after getting married huh?  maybe her spouse would end up being killed by Dracula, and she finds the whip.....




so that goes to show one way it could work.

[Clara E. Leet]

In Reply To #37

But then she technically would not be a Belmont by blood herself, and her power would be unfounded.

[DragonSlayr81]

The only way I can see Sonia existing in the main line is if she was the sister to a male Belmont heir, but he was too young to wield the whip at the time, hence she had to take it up and rise to the occasion. But either way, her child would not continue on the main Belmont lineage. Though, I think I made it a point elsewhere, as far as the branching off into other families, she can do that. I mean, that's likely how the Morris clan is connected to the Belmonts(female Belmont married into the Morris family, hence her children would be Belmont blooded Morrises). And as far as that was concerned, such a role as being the connecting link of two families, that's no small role. That female Belmont, alone, is responsible for the Quincy Morris, many years later, as well as John(uh, and Jonathan...urgh... two out of three ain't bad).

[Saner]

In Reply To #38


alright fine,

[Clara E. Leet]

...alright seriously? This thread reeks of stupidity and is about one more Saner or Saner-esque post away from getting locked.

Saner, are you actually serious about this entire thread or are you doing it just to get a rise out of people and get attention?

[Jorge D. Fuentes]

In Reply To #40

Either way, it's just way too stupid to be an actual thread by now.

I'm almost considering this to be just a spam thread.  Please curb any need for posting if there isn't some kind of rational thought behind it.

We're not in Grammar School, you know.

[Saner]

...alright seriously? This thread reeks of stupidity and is about one more Saner or Saner-esque post away from getting locked.

Saner, are you actually serious about this entire thread or are you doing it just to get a rise out of people and get attention?

Im serious, IGA shouldn't have messed with Sonia.   in fact I think Castlevania Resurrection (which was cancelled) was supposed to be a remake or retelling of Sonia's story, but IGA put a stop to that. 

[Clara E. Leet]

In Reply To #43

That's not the case at all, and Resurrection had NOTHING to do with Legends' story.

[darkwzrd4]

In Reply To #43

That's not the case at all, and Resurrection had NOTHING to do with Legends' story.

Yeah.  From what I understand, it was suppose to take place during the year 1666 I believe and supposedly Dracula was such a powerful threat the more than one Belmont was needed so through the miracle of time travel Sonya was suppose to appear to help out.  If you ask me, it was a stupid idea (almost as stupid as this thread has become) and I'm glad it was canceled.  Such a screwed up idea would have killed the series.