I'm actually pretty content with CV's explaination the way it is. I've never been tender over the whole "not incorporating the historical facts behind Dracula into fiction", especially the CV series. Most of the adapatations of Dracula, which based on Stoker's book, are re-imagined to some extent. Whether they change the origin of Dracula, it never bothered be. Like I said, to me, the importance of Dracula(the infamous vampire) himself outweighs that of Vlad III(and his historical accuracies). Besides, I actually don't mind considering how these are works of fantasy. I've never been a stickler for historical accuracy.
Like alot of parts of different fandoms, you got the people who like story and people who don't care so long as the game is good. I've had an
incredibly active imagination since I was a young kid, and adding onto stories that were already partially established helped me develop a taste for far-reaching and elaborate stories that had depth to them. Being a video game addict, this just transferred into the realm of gaming, and I liked thinking about the whole "What If" theoreticals.
To each their own. I'm just saying that it COULD be developed more.