Topic: Which gameplay engine do you like best for CV?

[Slayer]

Castleroids are prolly the best, but still, it's getting old now that we have six of them already (not counting OoS).  They should go back to mission based, I think.  Keep the map-style, but give different objections, to add a sense of purpose and cohesion.

[Bloodreign]

Original style, classical and stylish, and hard enough to make you practice a lot, and keep you challenged.

[CVfan13]

In Reply To #16

I would kinda like to see DMC's mission style for a CV game. DMC3 was enough like CV that I can tell it would be cool.

[Slayer]

In Reply To #18

You don't have to tell me!  If DMC3 were a CastleVania game, it would have been awesome!

[DoctaMario]

In Reply To #16

See, I think that the great thing about the 64 games' engine is that it's a mix of the classic and Castleroid styles. Some stages are more action based while some rely more on puzzles or exploration.

[SonOfBelmont]

Castlevania and the Q4 engine would be awsome since I have done some mods for games with it. And a very large huge castlevania would be cool to but lets throw something evenmore far fetched in to the styles. TES style where you get to choose your destany and be what ever you want to be do what you want to do. Fight along side Belmont or join Dracula and learn Devilforgery. Sounds kind of cool when you think of it, it gets you even more into the story by allowing you, the player, to set the stage and become the director.

[A vicar in a tutu]

If only they made a sandbox Castlevania.
Similar to Simon's Quest and have many, many inspirations from Vampire Hunter D(except for the futuristic setting)