In Reply To #1231
I suppose it's not bad for Gamestop, but Zelda and Prince of Persia aren't very similar. While Prince of Persia is based mainly on cunning and stealthy speed kills with a few bosses thrown in on occasion. The boss fights are extremely different from Zelda's. The typical boss fight (correct me if I'm wrong. I've only played one Prince of Persia game.) consists of climbing around on walls looking for an opportunity to jump down and speed kill the boss. In Zelda, there are numerous strategies you have to use to defeat bosses, like using the ice rod on the fire head and fire rod on the ice head, as well as the famous deflecting enemy attacks with a sword and striking them while they're stunned. Also, Zelda gameplay is based mainly on this pattern:
Find a dungeon from the world map, kill some enemies, solve a ton of puzzles, kill the mini boss, grab the treasure, use the new tool to get to the boss, kill the boss and go back to the world map.
Not only are there way more puzzles and obstacles than enemies (unlike Prince of Persia) but there's also a ton of exploring, as opposed to Prince of Persia's stages. There's no way to go back to previous levels or explore much.
Personally, I like Zelda WAY more than Prince of Persia!
