a while ago before los2 was released, i had a theory that in the climax, dracula uses the time machine located in his castle to travel back in time to prevent himself from turning & rescuing carmilla cornell & zobek (maybe even throw St. Germain in there to really mess with things), thus obliterating this timeline and allowing for the "canon" timeline to exist starting with lament,
i think that wouldve been a better ending than the 1 we got
or changing the status quo so instead of Gabriel becoming Dracula, he just has a normal fucking family, and we can get other belmonts doing their thing.
I know Castlevania is sort of weird without Dracula, but i DID always wish we'd get some other big bad evil monster overlords that aren't just shown up by Dracula in the end. Walter was cool. Though he was still just a Dracula stand-in. AoS was cool, as Dracula wasn't a villain at all, but the fucking protagonist, the main villain was basically the castle itself, and a mad cultist trying to obtain it's power.
I liked that in LoS, the villain thing was 3fold. you had 3 big bads, each representing a different prominent mythos character. A Werewolf, a Vampire, and Death. With an ancient demon thrown in for good measure, and Satan, because if you're gonna introduce Hell into the series(DoS), you might as well go all the way.
I'd be all for prequels with other Belmonts vs Dracula.
I liked that aspect of MoF, but I feel it was held back by it's awkward gameplay.
I LIKED LoS2's gameplay. the combat, specifically. the open world aspect was poorly done in general, though the castle was alright. I prefer LoS' chapter method, as it also allows for replaying bosses.
In the end I guess only time will tell.
That'd be something Kojima would do.
Im probably like the only person who'd actually be very ok with kojima directing a Castlevania. Knowing him, it'd be campy as hell, with a cheesy as fuck plot.