It's interesting how some in here think that this may be a real Castlevania game. I see a LOT of problems with that. Konami giving/"borrowing" IGA the name Castlevania to do a SotN 2 kickstarter makes very little sense, but I dunno... It immediately takes away a lot of the freedom for IGA, and kickstarter is all about freedom.
I also hear some people sometimes talking about that Konami should sell the license, maybe to IGA or to From Software or whoever. That sounds great, but would it work? Selling a brand would technically mean that Konami is not only selling the future of the series, but quite possibly the past.
Never again could the re-release or use the old Castlevanias cause they would effectively be owned by someone else, right? Though I don't really know how these things work, but that's what I'm thinking anyway. And Konami would probably never EVER do that.
The only franchise that comes to mind is Prince of Persia, which I think was sold to UbiSoft. Do UbiSoft own the entire history of PoP, or just the stuff they did with Sands of Time and onward? Hmmm. These things interest me quite a bit. Nobody wants Castlevania to be freed from Konamis clutches more than me, but I don't see how that would be done...