Castlevania Dungeon Forums

The Castlevania Dungeon Forums => General Castlevania Discussion => Topic started by: BLOOD MONKEY on July 23, 2014, 02:38:45 PM

Title: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: BLOOD MONKEY on July 23, 2014, 02:38:45 PM
Yay! A thread for asking questions! (and hopefully getting answered!)  ONLY CV BASED QUESTIONS. NO CV FANGAME QUESTIONS. NO FAN ANYTHING.   First question: Why did Alucard call himself Kid Dracula if he doesn't like his father? (at all)

ONLY 2 QUESTIONS PER POST!
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Nagumo on July 23, 2014, 03:20:28 PM
They're not the same character, it's a fan invention.   
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: BLOOD MONKEY on July 23, 2014, 04:24:30 PM
Okay.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: crisis on July 23, 2014, 05:10:09 PM
why does Alucard have to wear his 18th century outfit to unlock his true power in DoS i mean shouldnt his power come from within, not his clothes

what happened to the Librarian, how did he become trapped in the castle, is he good or evil

whats the deal with lyuudimil or whatever being alucards servant in Nocturne of Recollection

why didnt Dracula turn hector y isaac into vampires during their employ?

why doesnt Death have any role in the plot of AoS/DoS

why was Hammer cut as a playable character in DoS

why was that 5th ending where maria turns into a monster deleted from SotN?

why does Galamoth have a grudge against Dracula?

where was Dracula in the 15 years between cv Adventure & Belmont's Revenge?

what exact year does OoE take place?

what was the purpose of the Lost Soul in MoF

why cant the Belmonts touch the whip until 1999
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: uzo on July 23, 2014, 06:06:54 PM
why does Alucard have to wear his 18th century outfit to unlock his true power in DoS i mean shouldnt his power come from within, not his clothes
No budget to sprite him in a suit fully playable. Reused sprites, as per Castlevania staple.

If you want a story reason, maybe he's just better equipped to fight in that outfit. Or he just likes it.

what happened to the Librarian, how did he become trapped in the castle, is he good or evil
No one knows. It seem implied hes pretty evil, and he's been alive since the days of CV3 at least, just never shown. I see him as a cowardly type who hides when the Belmonts come knocking.

whats the deal with lyuudimil or whatever being alucards servant in Nocturne of Recollection
I never saw all of the translation that I recall, but it seemed like he was a familiar like those from SotN, or at least played the role of one.

why didnt Dracula turn hector y isaac into vampires during their employ?
Maybe he didn't feel they were worthy? It seemed like Dracula also found amusement in their rebellion against humanity, while still being human too. Dracula would eat up that irony, given his past and grudges.

why doesnt Death have any role in the plot of AoS/DoS
I've always questioned this. Death would have been a PHENOMENAL character in those stories. He has HUGE potential as he has such a long history with Dracula. He has vested interest in the outcome of this battle.

The best I could think of would be, simply, Death agrees that Soma must die in order to resurrect Dracula, and he's willing to do it himself. Pity there's no dialog to back up any of it though.

On the side though, its said that Dracula absorbed the Crimson Stone into his soul (not sure how that works but whatever), and since the Crimson Stone is what Dracula uses to control Death, wouldn't Soma be able to control death, having the same soul as Dracula?

That would have been really epic, having Death fight Soma but Soma realizing that power and using Death as an ally. And maybe Death is ok with that?

"I've been waiting for your call, my Master. I had to awaken you by force."

why was Hammer cut as a playable character in DoS
Budget and time. Sprites take time and money. Something they clearly were not allowed to have with the portables.

why was that 5th ending where maria turns into a monster deleted from SotN?
Could also be time and money issues. No one really knows. It's common for things to just be left out though, when the team feels it doesn't work or fit anymore.

why does Galamoth have a grudge against Dracula?
Kid Dracula. It really is probably an inside joke related to that. Wish they expanded upon it though. It could have been an interesting plot point somewhere along the line.

where was Dracula in the 15 years between cv Adventure & Belmont's Revenge?
It takes him time to recover from his body being destroyed. He was beaten, just not killed. Likely just hiding and recovering.

what exact year does OoE take place?
Unknown, but does it matter completely? The story works regardless.

what was the purpose of the Lost Soul in MoF
From my understanding, it was the Mirror of Fate's 'minion' so to speak. It's meant to guide the people who are tied to the mirror (who hold a piece?) along the path the mirror demands.

why cant the Belmonts touch the whip until 1999
Cooties. Honestly I'm not sure. The more we see of the series the less likely I am to believe it has to do with the whip being tainted in some manner, referencing SotN's ending.

I'm starting to think it was elective on the part of the Belmonts. It may be their form of power training, not relying on the whip will make them a lot stronger. Maybe there was more focus on utilizing relics and holy power. I mean, old man Julius unleashed the Holy Cross and the castle itself started to crumble in AoS.

The Belmonts may have just felt that relying on the power of the whip was making them feel too complacent. It's hard to say since there are no concrete references that lend any real hint.

The Lecarde family being the key to unlock the whip may or may not have a part in the actual reason it was handed to the Morris family or not. It's all rather mysterious still.

The only other thing I can think of is the Belmonts were busy endorsing and doing their own research into ways to completely kill off Dracula (which OoE might have been a part of that plan). This has some credence as we know Julius went into the 1999 battle with a specific plan to end Dracula's resurrection cycle.

That's all I got.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: BLOOD MONKEY on July 23, 2014, 06:22:04 PM
Why does crisis ask so many CV related questions?
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: K.K. Drunkinski on July 23, 2014, 07:40:56 PM
How does Dracula have the Frankenstein Monster as a minion as far back as the 1400s, when the Monster wasn't created until the 1800s? And if he was simply created earlier in the CV mythos, how did he get those clothes that are obviously from a much later century?
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: theANdROId on July 23, 2014, 07:42:12 PM
what happened to the Librarian, how did he become trapped in the castle, is he good or evil

No one knows. It seem implied hes pretty evil, and he's been alive since the days of CV3 at least, just never shown. I see him as a cowardly type who hides when the Belmonts come knocking.

I think it's pretty clear from SotN that he's more motivated by money than a loyalty to Dracula or anything else.  Maybe he does hide from the Belmonts, but I think he'd help them just the same as he did Alucard if they were paying customers.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: X on July 23, 2014, 11:52:09 PM
Quote
How does Dracula have the Frankenstein Monster as a minion as far back as the 1400s, when the Monster wasn't created until the 1800s? And if he was simply created earlier in the CV mythos, how did he get those clothes that are obviously from a much later century?

Castlevania was a blend of all the classic horror themed monsters putting count Dracula at the head of the pack. It was not meant to be taken seriously. The designers never thought that Castlevania would evolve into the juggernaut it is today and they never created a complex story to explain the details either. Back then it was putting together a fun, campy Halloween-esque game that even today, lives in infamy.

Quote
I think it's pretty clear from SotN that he's more motivated by money than a loyalty to Dracula or anything else.  Maybe he does hide from the Belmonts, but I think he'd help them just the same as he did Alucard if they were paying customers.

I think the Belmonts would have to fork over a heck of a lot more then Alucard has in order to even begin to employ the librarian's services. Alucard and the librarian already knew each other from days gone by so there was no conflict between them. The Belmonts on the other hand are sworn enemies of Dracula, and the librarian has absolutely no business in dealing with those who would destroy his lord and Castlevania. Since the librarian lives in Castlevania it's beneficial to him not to help Dracula's enemies succeed. Alucard is so-far the only known exception to this rule.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Claimh Solais on July 24, 2014, 12:26:13 AM
Why were there motorcycle-riding skeletons in the 1800s?

Why does Graham think he's Dracula just on the basis that "he was born the same day Dracula died" when I'm preeeeeetty sure there were several hundred OTHER people born that same day?

Where were the two Devil Forgemasters during the "war" in Dracula's Curse? I mean, their power was said to rival Death himself. I'm PRETTY DAMN SURE they could've kept the Belmont out of the castle for a little while.

Why doesn't Dracula ever employ a different strategy rather than I WILL WAIT YOU HERE, BELMONDO.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Ratty on July 24, 2014, 12:51:48 AM
How does Dracula have the Frankenstein Monster as a minion as far back as the 1400s, when the Monster wasn't created until the 1800s? And if he was simply created earlier in the CV mythos, how did he get those clothes that are obviously from a much later century?

It is a mystery. (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/AWizardDidIt) We may never know the answer. (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/MST3KMantra)

;)
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: theplottwist on July 24, 2014, 09:56:33 AM
Infinite heaps of speculation will follow. Read at your own risk.

Quote
why does Alucard have to wear his 18th century outfit to unlock his true power in DoS i mean shouldnt his power come from within, not his clothes

We're never given an answer as to *how* Alucard locked his powers, and this might just be the answer. Considering that Alucard draws his power from his garment on SotN, then he could have his powers locked on his garment. Thus, by equiping it again, his powers are brought back. Just like the "Alucart" status can be summoned by equipping Alucart equipment.

Quote
what happened to the Librarian, how did he become trapped in the castle, is he good or evil

Since the castle is ever changing, and by what happens when Richter meets the Master Librarian, it's safe to assume that the Librarian is not met all the time.

My personal hypothesis is that the Librarian Master is a ghostly appearance from the seller that got trapped in the castle on Harmony of Dissonance, and he refuses to help Belmonts as a grudge, because Juste left him there to die. Also, he wants you to pay because this is one of the material traits he clutched upon his death. As a seller, money was his life, and now as a ghost, he still craves money.

Quote
why didnt Dracula turn hector y isaac into vampires during their employ?

Maybe because he needed humans to do his bidding, just like Bram Stoker's Dracula needs. By removing their humanity, Hector and Isaac would be perceived as vampires by the populace, would be hunted, would be vulnerable by all sorts of anti vampire weapons, would not be able to walk under the sun etc etc

Quote
why doesnt Death have any role in the plot of AoS/DoS

Because Dracula is not there. Soma is, and he activelly refuses to be Dracula. Thus, what use is for Soma to be alive? Better kill him and have the dark lord reincarnate once more. This is also expanded upon a tiny bit on that novel "Ricordanza of the God Abyss".

Quote
why does Galamoth have a grudge against Dracula?

This is one good question. I wonder if Dracula defeated Galamoth in battle and enslaved him or something like this.

Quote
where was Dracula in the 15 years between cv Adventure & Belmont's Revenge?

I think he was hidden inside infant Soleyu

Quote
what was the purpose of the Lost Soul in MoF

What was the purpose of anything on that god forsaken game?

Now for Claim's questions:

Quote
Why does Graham think he's Dracula just on the basis that "he was born the same day Dracula died" when I'm preeeeeetty sure there were several hundred OTHER people born that same day?

Well, he probably knows about the Dark Lord Candidates thing. The "With Light" cult already exists, and Dario and Dmitrii are already members in it. Furthermore, he was born on the day Dracula died PLUS he's got powers. We just never see him using these powers. He DOES get through the castle safe enough to make it to the throne room. If he has powers AND was born in the same day, then couple this with delusions of grandeur and bam!

Quote
Where were the two Devil Forgemasters during the "war" in Dracula's Curse? I mean, their power was said to rival Death himself. I'm PRETTY DAMN SURE they could've kept the Belmont out of the castle for a little while.

There is a Curse of Darkness manga explaining this. Basically, Hector ran away as the war started, and Dracula sent Isaac after him, and that's it. The manga even shows them both sensing the exact moment that Dracula is killed offscreen as they battle each other far away.

Quote
Why doesn't Dracula ever employ a different strategy rather than I WILL WAIT YOU HERE, BELMONDO.

If I were a vampire which needed time to restore my powers, I damn sure would not face Belmont until he got to the highest tower, where I am resting drinking blood and performing rituals. It's strategy (And judging by the number of times we die on the game, it's a freaking good strategy, realistically speaking).
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: K.K. Drunkinski on July 24, 2014, 11:09:26 AM
Alright, with the question about the Frankenstein Monster, I was being a bit of a smartass, and already knew the obvious answer, but here's a real question I don't know the answer to:

While most are concerned about the gap left in the whole War of 1999 business, what I wanna know is, what exactly is the CV take on what happened with the Quincey Morris stuff? It obviously is NOT a direct acceptance of the events of the novel, because it is stated in CV lore that John Morris witnessed his father's death when his dad helped destroy Dracula, and if you're familiar with that book at all, Quincey most certainly did not have a child accompanying him during the final part of chasing Drac back to his castle.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Jorge D. Fuentes on July 24, 2014, 12:19:57 PM
Hmm... interesting tags you've got there, OP. :P

Why were there motorcycle-riding skeletons in the 1800s?

If you play the game, you learn that the vampire minions Dracula has employed have had enough time to start to create devices that, anachronistically, have yet to be designed by the human populace.  This includes, but is not limited to, motorbikes.  Hildebrand & Wolfmüller became the first series production motorcycle in 1892.  This game places most of its anachronistic devices at least 40-60 years early, in the castle.

Gotta love Anachronism Stew (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/AnachronismStew). ;)

This game takes place in the mid 1800's (circal 1852), with  In the Castle Center, there is a room that's housing a number of such devices, which appear to be:
-a model of a dirigible blimp
-a rudimentary radio transmitter
-a 'mixture-based' explosive-looking thing?  (sort of like the one from 'Die Hard with a Vengeance').
-a makeshift engine prototype (looks like a wankel engine or a dynamo)
-some other devices I cannot recognize

Some or all of these devices seem to have been engineered in the Tower of Science, where you can see electrical resonant transformer circuitry (Tesla Coils).  Nikola Tesla engineered Tesla Coils around 1891, so this is also an example of ahead-of-its-time technology.  The Particle Blasters (beam cannons), are also an example.  I guess this game's developers liked Tesla.

Of course, one should note that the Castlevania series has had a long-standing penchant for anachronism.

-Electrical devices in Lords of Shadow's Clockwork Tower (before such things existed).  A Clockwork Tower in the 11th
-Modern office chair in Curse of Darkness
-A Clockwork Tower in early 1400's (cv3)
-...and many more instances later on in the timeline(s)!
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: son_the_vampire on July 24, 2014, 05:38:07 PM
Who is Nathan Graves kin to?

Why does Dracula's return happen a such random intervals?

Why isn't there modern lighting throught the AoS/DoS games; i still break candles for some reason.

How come Death is able to make a return in many of the CV games but not enemies like Olrox or Beelzelbub?

How come Juste was the only Belmont who had traits from both parents i.e. ability to use tomes?

this is all i got for now
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: uzo on July 24, 2014, 06:47:43 PM
Who is Nathan Graves kin to?
It's never revealed. As a result of Circle of the Moon not being in the main story, instead being a side story, it has no known connection to any other game, hence we have no reference as to who Nathan's parents were.

Prior to that knowledge, when the game first released, I thought Nathan had to be an estranged son of Richter and Anette. I thought it was a really clever plot point, only to later know it meant dick all since it wasn't in the main storyline.

Why does Dracula's return happen a such random intervals?
Because the director of the games is not consistant and each of them respects "the timeline" to different degrees. Some of them don't give a shit and just want to make a game how they want to make it, and will use any date they feel like.

Why isn't there modern lighting throught the AoS/DoS games; i still break candles for some reason.
Check out the Village in DoS.

How come Death is able to make a return in many of the CV games but not enemies like Olrox or Beelzelbub?
Death is an entity that will always exist, and always recover. He cannot be 'killed'. The same can't be said for basically anyone who is not Death or Dracula. Hell, even Dracula was killed eventually.

How come Juste was the only Belmont who had traits from both parents i.e. ability to use tomes?
If you need a story explanation, then: It's a genetical gamble, and he won? IGA always stated he goes gameplay first, then fits a story to it. It's merely a product of him not using the same (or similar) gameplay mechanic again when a Belmont has been involved.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: The Puritan on July 25, 2014, 10:33:21 AM
Who were the 'men in power' who gave Dracula's remains to Ecclesia?

Was Barlowe always evil or did working on Dominus corrupt him to it?
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: theplottwist on July 25, 2014, 11:39:11 AM
Quote
Why does Dracula's return happen a such random intervals?

This question always bothers me because it's been always clear for me that Dracula returns at quite consistent intervals, but this process can be bypassed through rituals.

1476 - His first appearance
~100 year timespan~
1576 - His second appearance. Christopher fails to defeat Dracula and he survives in hiding for 15 years possessing Soleyu later.
~115 year timespan~
1691 - His third appearance. Notice how the 15 years were correctly added to the timespan. Simon retrieves his remains and ressurrects him six years later.
~101 year timespan~
1792 - His fourth appearance. Granted, Dracula was brought back by Shaft, but remember how his corruption makes people work to bring him back? This can be one such tool of his to ressurrect.
~106 year timespan~
1897 - Fifth appearance, possibly Bram Stoker's story.
~109 year timespan~
1999 - Julius' final battle.

What I mean is that Dracula seems to be able to return only in dire situations OR after the ~100 years rule~, in which many periods coincide. Notice how the aberrant ressurrection periods happen very shortly after one that would fit inside the rule, and is generally done after Dracula employed a gamble before his death to ensure his early ressurrection.

Aberrant games would be Curse of Darkness, Simon's Quest, Harmony of Dissonance, Symphony of the Night, Portrait of Ruin, Order of Ecclesia.
In Curse of Darkness, Dracula's gamble is to curse the land so the people's anguish can bring him back. But we do see that a very complex plan by Isaac is done to bring the Castle back. Just after Isaac is dead, Death comes in and uses his body to bring Dracula back using the poisonous influence of the Curse within him. Notice that Dracula isn't back until this very point.
In Simon's Quest, Dracula gambles by cursing Simon with a wound on his back. I believe that Dracula knew Simon would try to bring him back to finish the curse, and so saw a chance to kill Simon later, since he couldn't when Simon was at his peak.
Harmony of Dissonance does not have Dracula in it.
Symphony carries on from Rondo. Shaft does all that gamble to bring Dracula back, and that also seems to be a case where Shaft knew all along Richter would defeat Dracula, and thus used it to bring Dracula back later.
In Portrait of Ruin, Dracula IS NOT alive until after Brauner is gone. Death brings him back through unknown means, but I'm willing to believe that this was an "opportunity" case. The Castle was up, Death was there, War and sorrow was raging on, thus Dracula came back. Either that, or having the Castle up brings Dracula back, and this was done by Brauner, who used his magic to have the Castle without Dracula in it. This is the second time Death does this: The castle is up, but Dracula is not there, thus Death goes and uses the opportunity to bring Dracula back at the last minute.
Order of Ecclesia happens somewhere in the 1800's. I cannot think of an argument here beyond the fact that Barlowe also went to great lengths to speed up Dracula's ressurrection.

My opinion is that his canon ressurrections are not as absurd as people make it to be. There are some very specific things going on that explain well how Dracula came back before his time. Specially the "Castle is up but Dracula is not, thus Death can do it".

Quote
Why isn't there modern lighting throught the AoS/DoS games; i still break candles for some reason.

Beyond Uzo's point, well... Dracula's castle is something frozen in time, man. It was made to look like a medieval castle, and it probably will always be. On Aria it's his castle, and on Dawn it's a replica (in which the village is possibly not part of the castle itself, adding more to the "timeless" sense when inside the castle itself).

Quote
How come Death is able to make a return in many of the CV games but not enemies like Olrox or Beelzelbub?

Death is Dracula's main man, dude. Also, the hero does never explore Dracula's castle in it's full. It's quite possible that there are bosses never fought xD
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: X on July 25, 2014, 04:27:44 PM
Quote
How come Death is able to make a return in many of the CV games but not enemies like Olrox or Beelzelbub?

Because Death is Death; The Grim reaper, Harvester of souls, Angel of Death, the horseman of Death who is one of four of the Apocalypse. As long as there is death, then Death himself will always exist. It's part of the natural order of finite life. However Death seems to have left behind his sacred duty to the whole when he joined on with Dracula. Some would consider Death to be a shinigam (death god) but Death from CV looks nothing like a shinigami. He looks like the European version where there is only one grim reaper; Death or Thanatos which is his name in Greek.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Nagumo on July 25, 2014, 05:44:05 PM
A classic:

Why does Dracula continue to be evil (in-universe) after Alucard basically redeemed him in SotN? Sadly, after 17 years we still don't have an answer to this.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Claimh Solais on July 25, 2014, 05:49:27 PM
Why does Dracula continue to be evil (in-universe) after Alucard basically redeemed him in SotN? Sadly, after 17 years we still don't have an answer to this.

I don't know where (can't find the link anymore), so I'm assuming it's fan speculation, but I read somewhere a long time ago that Dracula, when prematurely resurrected, doesn't return with all of his memories, due to the premature resurrection affecting him. I further speculated upon that, thinking that these effects were permanent, and thus he lost all memory of his time with his son.

That's my theory anyway. I dunno.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: BLOOD MONKEY on July 25, 2014, 05:55:14 PM
I don't know where (can't find the link anymore), so I'm assuming it's fan speculation, but I read somewhere a long time ago that Dracula, when prematurely resurrected, doesn't return with all of his memories, due to the premature resurrection affecting him. I further speculated upon that, thinking that these effects were permanent, and thus he lost all memory of his time with his son.

That's my theory anyway. I dunno.

I actually think that's correct. Playing through the next CV Games, he is still a spiteful bastard like in CV 1,2,3,4, Adventure, and Legends.

Damn, I made an active thread.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Nagumo on July 25, 2014, 06:23:43 PM
I hope that's not true because that would be a pretty lame way of ignoring a scene of such importance...

Also, I've been listening to the radio drama for the first time, and I thought it was kind off amusing how they also ignore that scene in the recap. Makes me wonder if IGA just wrote himself in a corner there and decided to just no bring it up again.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: crisis on July 25, 2014, 07:30:03 PM
why was that woman crying when talking to Alucard in the confessional in symphony

why was Eric's spirit trapped in the castle after he died

why did Alucard create the Spear to "compliment the power of the whip" when the whip has been doing it's job for centuries

why is there no Morris character in OoE when there should be 1

why does Victor's combat cross resemble Gabrian's when logically it should resemble Trevor's

what happened to the God/Devil masks

where does Dario run off to after he's stripped of his powers in DoS

if the military was involved in the Demon castle War of 1999, why does Soma think the tale of Dracula was "made up" when there's documented proof of the supernatural

why does Hugh think nathaniel's whip is so important

what is the contingency plan if a Belmont fails & is killed in the castle

why is Alucard wearing 18th century attire in the 15th century (legends)

why is alucard y Dracula blue-skinned(legends)

at what point were the Belmonts exiled from Romania, and why if they were Holy warriors

how did Dracula conduct taboo rituals in his demon fortress every night for centuries unnoticed
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: BLOOD MONKEY on July 25, 2014, 08:50:48 PM
why was that woman crying when talking to Alucard in the confessional in symphony

why was Eric's spirit trapped in the castle after he died

why did Alucard create the Spear to "compliment the power of the whip" when the whip has been doing it's job for centuries

why is there no Morris character in OoE when there should be 1

why does Victor's combat cross resemble Gabrian's when logically it should resemble Trevor's

what happened to the God/Devil masks

where does Dario run off to after he's stripped of his powers in DoS

if the military was involved in the Demon castle War of 1999, why does Soma think the tale of Dracula was "made up" when there's documented proof of the supernatural

why does Hugh think nathaniel's whip is so important

what is the contingency plan if a Belmont fails & is killed in the castle

why is Alucard wearing 18th century attire in the 15th century (legends)

why is alucard y Dracula blue-skinned(legends)

at what point were the Belmonts exiled from Romania, and why if they were Holy warriors

how did Dracula conduct taboo rituals in his demon fortress every night for centuries unnoticed

Because of Crisis, I limit you people to only 2 questions per post.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Ratty on July 25, 2014, 10:01:07 PM
why was that woman crying when talking to Alucard in the confessional in symphony

Presumably she was one of the many unhappy souls connected to and possibly trapped within the Castle.

why was Eric's spirit trapped in the castle after he died

I believe there's a comment about him choosing to stay to try and keep on top of things. Not positive.

why did Alucard create the Spear to "compliment the power of the whip" when the whip has been doing it's job for centuries

So that non-Belmonts like himself would have a powerful weapon in the fight against Dracula, presumably.

why is there no Morris character in OoE when there should be 1

Why? It's possible the Morris/Belmont connection was not even known to the Morris's of that time.

where does Dario run off to after he's stripped of his powers in DoS

Unclear, maybe one of the audio dramas explains it.

if the military was involved in the Demon castle War of 1999, why does Soma think the tale of Dracula was "made up" when there's documented proof of the supernatural

Your standard military/government cover-up.

why does Hugh think nathaniel's whip is so important

Because Hugh's family are caretakers of the whip. It's their job to take care of it so it's a big deal to him.

what is the contingency plan if a Belmont fails & is killed in the castle

Assuming there is ever a contingency plan that would depend on the particular Belmont/period I'm sure.

why is Alucard wearing 18th century attire in the 15th century (legends)

why is alucard y Dracula blue-skinned(legends)

Artistic license. Also you could say because that game takes place in an alternate reality. Depending how you prefer your head canon.

at what point were the Belmonts exiled from Romania, and why if they were Holy warriors

I don't remember an exact date if one is given. But it's because the common people feared their supernatural power.

how did Dracula conduct taboo rituals in his demon fortress every night for centuries unnoticed

I don't think there was ever a period where he operated for centuries at a time was there? In any case it's not so much that his misdeeds were unnoticed as that there were very few hunters powerful enough to stop him.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Claimh Solais on July 25, 2014, 10:19:35 PM
I hope that's not true because that would be a pretty lame way of ignoring a scene of such importance...

Also, I've been listening to the radio drama for the first time, and I thought it was kind off amusing how they also ignore that scene in the recap. Makes me wonder if IGA just wrote himself in a corner there and decided to just no bring it up again.

I wondered about the same thing when listening to the radio drama. Dracula was completely written out save for a generic stock scream.

at what point were the Belmonts exiled from Romania, and why if they were Holy warriors

People fear what they don't understand. I think that's pretty much all the explanation this question needs.

Case in point, Ys II: Castle in the Sky, Adol was feared as a harbinger of evil due to the fact that he knew there was a land outside of the continent of Ys, which the other people were oblivious to.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: X on July 25, 2014, 10:43:22 PM
Quote
why was Eric's spirit trapped in the castle after he died

Eric Lecarde mentioned that he stayed behind due to regret. Regret of having lost his daughters over to Brauner. In order for Lecarde to remain without being lost he used magic to bind himself to Castlevania just before he died.

Quote
why does Hugh think nathaniel's whip is so important

Jealousy. Jealous at Nathan for being named Morris Baldwin's successor and receiving the Hunter whip by his own father rather then him. Hugh believes very strongly that it is the whip that grants Nathan his strength to bring down the tough monsters in Carmilla's castle, and because Nathan could never beat Hugh in training once.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Koutei on July 26, 2014, 01:50:55 AM
A classic:

Why does Dracula continue to be evil (in-universe) after Alucard basically redeemed him in SotN? Sadly, after 17 years we still don't have an answer to this.
IGA has already answered in 2000.
http://castlevaniadungeon.net/forums/index.php/topic,4807.msg100104.html#msg100104 (http://castlevaniadungeon.net/forums/index.php/topic,4807.msg100104.html#msg100104)

*Google Translate:
In the "Nocturne in the Moonlight" PS, Dracula I will perish with reform, but resurrected for some reason in the age of the later. Those who have been sealed in the Makai, because only the evil part is amplified, by performing a ritual of revival, such as followers of darkness is a look at the time, without the intention of Dracula himself, this is only evil intention but it seems that in order to revive. However, we wanted to give a complete rest to Dracula someday.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: theplottwist on July 26, 2014, 05:53:57 AM
IGA has already answered in 2000.
http://castlevaniadungeon.net/forums/index.php/topic,4807.msg100104.html#msg100104 (http://castlevaniadungeon.net/forums/index.php/topic,4807.msg100104.html#msg100104)

*Google Translate:
In the "Nocturne in the Moonlight" PS, Dracula I will perish with reform, but resurrected for some reason in the age of the later. Those who have been sealed in the Makai, because only the evil part is amplified, by performing a ritual of revival, such as followers of darkness is a look at the time, without the intention of Dracula himself, this is only evil intention but it seems that in order to revive. However, we wanted to give a complete rest to Dracula someday.

So, by what I understood, the ritual to bring Dracula back corrupts Dracula's mind with evil/forces him to do his sorcerer's destructive bidding by amplifying his hatred enough for him to be recklessly evil?
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Nagumo on July 26, 2014, 06:00:22 AM
Wow, thanks Koutei! どうもありがとう  :)

From what I can gather, I think it says those who are sealed away in the "Makai" (the place where Dracula goes to when he dies) are corrupted and their evil side is amplified. That's a very good answer.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Claimh Solais on July 26, 2014, 06:26:21 AM
I will make note of this. That's actually something that should've been talked about in the games.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: DragonSlayr81 on July 27, 2014, 12:59:42 AM
Wow, thanks Koutei! どうもありがとう  :)

From what I can gather, I think it says those who are sealed away in the "Makai" (the place where Dracula goes to when he dies) are corrupted and their evil side is amplified. That's a very good answer.
That's what it sounds like and the concept of the Makai being a place in the CV is interesting. Really, IGA should've done more with THIS type of thing rather than, well, what he eventually did.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Jorge D. Fuentes on July 27, 2014, 09:40:31 PM
The Makai (World of Spirits) seems to be implying the place where the dead go.
In Western World religion, it would be hell/heaven/purgatory/limbo.
Dracula cannot go to heaven, and I don't think he goes to Hell either, so I'm guessing he goes to a void in Limbo/purgatory.

At first I thought it would just be "The Void", or "The Chaos Realm" but that's not where the dead go from what that word seems to mean.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: crisis on July 27, 2014, 09:53:21 PM
in curse of darkness upon defeat Dracula says his soul shall return to the "Abyss"
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Claimh Solais on July 27, 2014, 10:24:18 PM
So there's a lot to Castlevania's old timeline that's only subtly hinted at, like the whole "Makai/Abyss" thing for Dracula, and then the whole story about Dracula's resurrection in 2035. THIS COULD HAVE BEEN SO MUCH BETTER IF THEY ACTUALLY TALKED ABOUT THIS SHIT IN THE GAMES.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Jorge D. Fuentes on July 27, 2014, 10:28:43 PM
It would've been a lot of exposition.
I would've been OK with it, but I imagine gamers playing the thing on their GBA didn't want walls upon walls of text.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: X on July 27, 2014, 10:56:20 PM
It doesn't need to be wall after wall of text. A brief but straight to the point explanation would have satisfied the audiences. Or in AoS it could be explained in a tome you find or like one of those unlockable info dumps that were featured in DoS.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Claimh Solais on July 27, 2014, 11:11:09 PM
It doesn't need to be wall after wall of text. A brief but straight to the point explanation would have satisfied the audiences. Or in AoS it could be explained in a tome you find or like one of those unlockable info dumps that were featured in DoS.

Precisely like that. They could add in stuff like "files" and all that shit, like you'd see in Resident Evil. Like, they're completely optional to read, but they give a lot more insight and backstory on the plot.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: DragonSlayr81 on July 28, 2014, 02:50:21 AM
Precisely like that. They could add in stuff like "files" and all that shit, like you'd see in Resident Evil. Like, they're completely optional to read, but they give a lot more insight and backstory on the plot.
In Final Fantasy(like FFXIII), I'm against the majority of exposition occuring through data log entries, but for a Castlevania game, that's fine. Two different beasts. In FF's case, it's a long tale that has TIME for the exposition(but in some cases, it just doesn't choose to do it, or explains things horribly shallow). CV, on the other hand, isn't meant to be a long, text/story-heavy adventure. That would break up the pacing, so a datalog would actually work fine.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Shinobi on July 28, 2014, 03:39:26 AM
The Makai (World of Spirits) seems to be implying the place where the dead go.
In Western World religion, it would be hell/heaven/purgatory/limbo.
Dracula cannot go to heaven, and I don't think he goes to Hell either, so I'm guessing he goes to a void in Limbo/purgatory.

At first I thought it would just be "The Void", or "The Chaos Realm" but that's not where the dead go from what that word seems to mean.

World of Spirits is Reikai, Makai means Demon world and was supposed to be another living world but monsters or demons as citizens as the name implies so it's not a world where dead people go like tenkai(heaven) or Jigoku(hell) , Yu Yu Hakusho and Touhou Project is a big example.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Claimh Solais on July 28, 2014, 04:26:32 AM
In Final Fantasy(like FFXIII), I'm against the majority of exposition occuring through data log entries, but for a Castlevania game, that's fine. Two different beasts. In FF's case, it's a long tale that has TIME for the exposition(but in some cases, it just doesn't choose to do it, or explains things horribly shallow). CV, on the other hand, isn't meant to be a long, text/story-heavy adventure. That would break up the pacing, so a datalog would actually work fine.

Yeah, think like Resident Evil. Without the files, the stories are pretty small in terms of actual plot, with the files really building on the story. Outside of RE5 and RE6, the entire story was never meant to be told to you through cutscenes and dialog. You had to read the files to learn the plot.

The same could be done with Castlevania, and hell, that was done with LoS (mostly).
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Nagumo on July 28, 2014, 09:29:00 AM
There's barely any lore anyway, so adding more of it couldn't hurt.   
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Ratty on July 28, 2014, 07:15:59 PM
There's barely any lore anyway, so adding more of it couldn't hurt.

The series was pretty lore-averse. Maybe because the original "every 100 years" thing turned out to be a big setback after a while? It also got pretty retcon-y at points (most notably with LoI contradicting CV3, which had seemed to confirm Dracula in the series was the historical Vlad Tepes) which is only exacerbated by the sloppy conveying or perhaps even intentional obfuscation of which entries were "gaidens" to the non-Japanese audience.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: beingthehero on July 29, 2014, 10:55:55 AM
Sometimes leaving stuff vague or up to the player's imagination is better than explaining every last detail.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Nagumo on July 29, 2014, 12:20:53 PM
Sometimes leaving stuff vague or up to the player's imagination is better than explaining every last detail.

Nobody is saying they should do that though, Hero-kun.   
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: beingthehero on July 29, 2014, 02:56:05 PM
Well sombody should so I can feel contrarion about something.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: X on July 29, 2014, 03:01:26 PM
Quote
Sometimes leaving stuff vague or up to the player's imagination is better than explaining every last detail.

Castlevania was have been fine with that in its heyday. However when IGA started making the series very heavily story-oriented it became necessary to have all the little details explained. Unfortunately it was left ambiguous and this left us with more guesses and questions then answers.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Claimh Solais on July 29, 2014, 07:09:22 PM
Sometimes leaving stuff vague or up to the player's imagination is better than explaining every last detail.

This would be nice, except for the fact that stuff was left too vague. As a result, people were confused as to why Dracula was confused after his "redemption" in SotN. Also, people believed it was Castlevania taking a hugely anime route by moving the game to Japan (AoS), but there was actually a large amount of backstory behind that. None of which was ever explained and required people to look it up online, and it wasn't even Konami we got the info from.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Jorge D. Fuentes on July 29, 2014, 10:16:22 PM
Every time I hear Lore, I think of the AWESOMENESS...

...that was Metroid Prime and its:

    Pirate Data
    Chozo Lore
    Creatures
    Research
    Artifacts

It was amazing the way you scanned that stuff and learned so much stuff.  Of course, it was all optional but it was great.  I gobbled it all up, nomnomnom.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: BLOOD MONKEY on August 05, 2014, 03:53:13 PM
How do the belmonts work? Do they each live to be around 150 years old or something? Cause in the games, Trevor vs. Drac: 1400
Simon vs Drac: 1500 Juste vs Drac: 1600 Richter vs. Drac: 1700     And Simon is son of Trevor, Juste is son of Simon, Richter is son of Juste (?), and so on and so on.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: theplottwist on August 05, 2014, 04:18:47 PM
How do the belmonts work? Do they each live to be around 150 years old or something? Cause in the games, Trevor vs. Drac: 1400
Simon vs Drac: 1500 Juste vs Drac: 1600 Richter vs. Drac: 1700     And Simon is son of Trevor, Juste is son of Simon, Richter is son of Juste (?), and so on and so on.

I.. Don't even...

Where did you see that Simon is Trevor's son, or that Juste is Simon's son, or Richter is Juste's son? And you forgot Christopher there.

In Juste's case, the game even explains that Simon has defeated Dracula fifty years before HoD. The game never mentions Juste as Simon's son, but the manuals and some other games refer to the "most recent Belmont" always as "descendant", except in Soleyu's case, where it explicitly says that Soleyu is Christopher's son.

Belmonts pretty much have a common human lifespan, probably.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: BLOOD MONKEY on August 05, 2014, 04:57:59 PM
Los and various other sources say that simon is trevor's son. Like I said, I'm not sure who Richter's father was though. But all of Draculas defeats are 100 years apart...
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: BLOOD MONKEY on August 05, 2014, 05:01:58 PM
Wait... Nevermind. I feel horribly stupid now. http://rocksclan.com/images/familytree.JPG (http://rocksclan.com/images/familytree.JPG)
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Jorge D. Fuentes on August 05, 2014, 07:23:12 PM
Simon IS Trevor's Son... in LoS-Verse.
But in that universe, Trevor is Gabriel's Son.
And Gabriel becomes Dracula.
(click to show/hide)

As for the more expanded Classic/IGA-verse, they're never called out on their exact lineage, except for a few:

-Leon Belmont is the first recorded Belmont in the IGA/Classic timeline.
-We know Trevor Raphael Christopher* Belmont married Sypha Fernandez/Belnades (mentioned in Harmony of Dissonance's developer notes/interviews, confirmed in the Castlevania Judgment dialogue)
-We know for a fact that Soleiyu is Christopher's son.
-We know Simon is descendant of Trevor.  However, he is not Trevor's Son.
-We know Juste is Simon's Grandson

*fixed, after finding out Cornelius is only a fanon surname, and in the IGA conversations, he mentions the C being for Christopher, to tie him somewhat to his descendant, Christopher Belmont.

--from the Castlevania: Harmony of Dissonance script--
Quote
Maxim: Long ago, you told me of Dracula's remains. Do you remember that?
Juste: Yes, I remember. The story of how my grandfather, Simon, gathered Dracula's remains and destroyed them to undo his curse.

-We know Jonathan Morris is John Morris's Son, and John is Quincy Morris's Son.
-We know the last known Belmonts in the IGA timeline are Julius Belmont and his little sister, Kokoro Belmont.

These are the facts about the Belmont Family.

Now for the speculation.  These is all conjecture, unfounded, only bits and pieces have been revealed, not enough to connect any dots meaningfully:

-Sonia is Descendant of Leon through her Grandfather

-Some rumors exist that Trevor is Sonia's Son (dates are very close together)
-Other rumors exist that Trevor is Sonia and Alucard's Son (some speculation based on the events in Legends, but very vague)
-Other rumors exist that Trevor is a brother or a cousin to Sonia, but not a direct descendant.

-Christopher Belmont is Trevor's Grandston (dates match up)
-Simon is Soleiyu's Son (dates match up)
-Richter is Juste's Grandston (dates match up)
a disappearance of Belmonts happens at this time, making it difficult to know much about the name "Belmont"

-Reinhardt Schneider is a Belmont descendant (the truth).  It is unconfirmed how direct of a descendant from Richter Belmont, the last recorded Belmont so far, this descendant is (the speculation)
-Quincy Morris is a Belmont descendant (the truth).  It is unconfirmed how direct of a descendant from Richter Belmont, the last recorded Belmont so far, this descendant is (the speculation).
-There are rumors that claim that the Schneiders and Morris clans are cousin clans to Belmonts, with a common Belmont ancestor (female Belmonts have existed in the past, and I don't think it would be uncommon for a few daughters to have appeared so far, besides Sonia)
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: BLOOD MONKEY on August 05, 2014, 07:33:07 PM
I wonder if Alucard could call Soma his brother........
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: theplottwist on August 05, 2014, 11:25:01 PM
I wonder if Alucard could call Soma his brother........

Father you mean?

-We know Trevor Raphael Cornelius Belmont married Sypha Fernandez/Belnades (mentioned in Harmony of Dissonance's
developer notes/interviews, confirmed in the Castlevania Judgment dialogue)

Wait... Where is Trevor's complete name mentioned?? Was not the "C" intended to stand for "Christopher"?

Quote
-We know the last known Belmonts in the IGA timeline are Julius Belmont and his little sister, Kokoro Belmont.

Kokoro Belmont is not canon to the main Castlevania universe.

WTF Jorge!
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: BLOOD MONKEY on August 05, 2014, 11:28:14 PM
Oh yeah... Or that.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Koutei on August 05, 2014, 11:44:52 PM
Wait... Nevermind. I feel horribly stupid now. http://rocksclan.com/images/familytree.JPG (http://rocksclan.com/images/familytree.JPG)
This is an unofficially fan made.



You should check these.
http://castlevania.wikia.com/wiki/Castlevania_Timeline (http://castlevania.wikia.com/wiki/Castlevania_Timeline)
http://castlevania.wikia.com/wiki/Lords_of_Shadow_Timeline (http://castlevania.wikia.com/wiki/Lords_of_Shadow_Timeline)
http://castlevania.wikia.com/wiki/Belmont_Family_Tree (http://castlevania.wikia.com/wiki/Belmont_Family_Tree)
http://castlevania.wikia.com/wiki/Lords_of_Shadow_Family_Tree (http://castlevania.wikia.com/wiki/Lords_of_Shadow_Family_Tree)
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: BLOOD MONKEY on August 05, 2014, 11:49:28 PM
This is an unofficially fan made.

Is it not correct?
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Koutei on August 06, 2014, 12:08:29 AM
Is it not correct?
Castlevania timeline is not one. This family tree does not reflect it. Please refer to link pages for details.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: theplottwist on August 06, 2014, 12:09:33 AM
Is it not correct?

Well... It gets most of the things right, but misses on some quite important ones.

Firstly, Sonia Belmont is not canon, and thus Trevor is not Sonia and Alucard's son (As Jorge put up there).

Secondly, Illyanna Riktor doesn't exist on the main Castlevania canon. She's a creation for the "Castlevania: Belmont Legacy" comic.

Desmond, Dolores and Zoe are from Order of Shadows, another non-canon game.

From all of Simon's wifes, only Serena has a shred of a chance of being canon (thanks to Haunted Castle). The others come from novels, comics and other non canon sources.

Maria Renard never had Eric Lecarde with Alucard. The Lecardes are Belmont descendants.

The Schneiders (Castlevania 64) are not canon.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Jorge D. Fuentes on August 06, 2014, 01:26:09 AM
Hey man, I've played Otomedius Excellent and it mentions Julius Belmont by name as her big brother.
There's nothing out there that says that game is NOT canon.

Then again, going by 'all appearances', we'd have to start getting to the nitty gritty and deciding which games use characters in alternate universes, that are most certainly, definitely, not canon (Konami Dream TV Mix, Otomedius series, Konami Wai Wai World, Pachislot titles, etc.).
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Claimh Solais on August 06, 2014, 01:49:35 AM
Julius' younger sister is Kokoro. This is pretty funny and I'm okay with it.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Chernabogue on August 06, 2014, 06:24:08 AM
You should check these.
http://castlevania.wikia.com/wiki/Castlevania_Timeline (http://castlevania.wikia.com/wiki/Castlevania_Timeline)
http://castlevania.wikia.com/wiki/Lords_of_Shadow_Timeline (http://castlevania.wikia.com/wiki/Lords_of_Shadow_Timeline)
http://castlevania.wikia.com/wiki/Belmont_Family_Tree (http://castlevania.wikia.com/wiki/Belmont_Family_Tree)
http://castlevania.wikia.com/wiki/Lords_of_Shadow_Family_Tree (http://castlevania.wikia.com/wiki/Lords_of_Shadow_Family_Tree)
I'm glad someone appreaciates my work on the CVW. It was hard as hell to do.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Nagumo on August 06, 2014, 08:45:34 AM
Wait... Where is Trevor's complete name mentioned?? Was not the "C" intended to stand for "Christopher"?

That's a fan name. Per the  story writer of CV3  (http://archive.2ch-ranking.net/retro/1250936811.html) Trevor's middle initial was supposed to stand for Christopher. That was because he was supposed to be the same Christopher mentioned in CV1's manual. So "Trevor Christopher Belmont" was originally conceived as the same character as Christopher from the GB games. IGA later retconned this to he could fit CV3 and the CVA in the same continuity. So who knows what his middle name is in the IGA canon.

Hey man, I've played Otomedius Excellent and it mentions Julius Belmont by name as her big brother.
 

Could you source that for me, Jorge? I think the CV wiki has been trying to confirm that for a couple of years or so.
 
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Jorge D. Fuentes on August 06, 2014, 12:07:41 PM
It's in the character bio in the X360 version.
I own the game and it's there, but I don't have a reliable screencapture.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: X on August 06, 2014, 02:52:03 PM
Quote
Well... It gets most of the things right, but misses on some quite important ones.

Firstly, Sonia Belmont is not canon, and thus Trevor is not Sonia and Alucard's son (As Jorge put up there).

Secondly, Illyanna Riktor doesn't exist on the main Castlevania canon. She's a creation for the "Castlevania: Belmont Legacy" comic.

Desmond, Dolores and Zoe are from Order of Shadows, another non-canon game.

From all of Simon's wifes, only Serena has a shred of a chance of being canon (thanks to Haunted Castle). The others come from novels, comics and other non canon sources.

Maria Renard never had Eric Lecarde with Alucard. The Lecardes are Belmont descendants.

The Schneiders (Castlevania 64) are not canon.

There's also the fact that Maria Renard is actually a Belmont descendant and is not blood-related to Annette. The RoB game story mentions it.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Nagumo on August 06, 2014, 03:22:35 PM
It's in the character bio in the X360 version.
I own the game and it's there, but I don't have a reliable screencapture.

If it's not too much trouble, could you please post a transcript of the bio? That would probably be good enough as a source.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Shinobi on August 06, 2014, 07:51:23 PM
There's also the fact that Maria Renard is actually a Belmont descendant and is not blood-related to Annette. The RoB game story mentions it.

I already thought Annette was possibly not related to Maria at all  even though Maria calls her as oneechan or oneesan(big sister), something like the way a little boy or girl address to someone who is older than him/her but not too distant. Note that Maria calls Richter as Oniichan(big brother) even in their first meeting/encounter.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Claimh Solais on August 07, 2014, 12:43:52 AM
I think people back then were reading too much into Maria calling Annette "big sister". I, personally, think that she didn't mean that Annette was literally her sister, but rather meant that as a form of respect, or even considers her close enough to be a sister.

Dracula X on SNES made them blood-related, but for obvious reasons, that game isn't the canon version of the story.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: theplottwist on August 07, 2014, 02:22:23 AM
It's in the character bio in the X360 version.
I own the game and it's there, but I don't have a reliable screencapture.

Well, the only game I know has bio for the characters on X360 is Castlevania: Harmony of Despair, and no mention for Trevor Belmont is made on that game (to my knowledge). Symphony of the Night's port also doesn't mention Trevor by name outside of Fake Trevor (also to my knowledge). I'm really curious about this.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Claimh Solais on August 07, 2014, 02:23:51 AM
Well, the only game I know has bio for the characters on X360 is Castlevania: Harmony of Despair, and no mention for Trevor Belmont is made on that game (to my knowledge). Symphony of the Night's port also doesn't mention Trevor by name outside of Fake Trevor (also to my knowledge). I'm really curious about this.

Trevor is mentioned by name in SotN by Richter, when he finds out who Alucard is. Original dub, by the way. Not the DXC dub. DXC's dub left that line stupidly ambiguous as to what he meant.

"Alucard? THE Alucard? You can't be... That was over three hundred years ago!" ~DXC Dub
"Alucard? The same Alucard who fought alongside my ancestor Trevor Belmont? But that was over three hundred years ago!" ~PS1 Dub (I don't know what I typed is 100% accurate)
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: theplottwist on August 07, 2014, 02:32:34 AM
Trevor is mentioned by name in SotN by Richter, when he finds out who Alucard is. Original dub, by the way. Not the DXC dub. DXC's dub left that line stupidly ambiguous as to what he meant.

"Alucard? THE Alucard? You can't be... That was over three hundred years ago!" ~DXC Dub
"Alucard? The same Alucard who fought alongside my ancestor Trevor Belmont? But that was over three hundred years ago!" ~PS1 Dub (I don't know what I typed is 100% accurate)

Ah yes, but I meant on the sense Jorge meant. It shows up on a character bio, but there's only two "bio systems" on X360, one in HoD (where no mention to Trevor is made) and one in SotN, where it's about Fake Trevor. I wanna know from just where came this "Cornelius".
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Claimh Solais on August 07, 2014, 02:38:41 AM
Ah yes, but I meant on the sense Jorge meant. It shows up on a character bio, but there's only two "bio systems" on X360, one in HoD (where no mention to Trevor is made) and one in SotN, where it's about Fake Trevor. I wanna know from just where came this "Cornelius".

Ooooh. I misunderstood. My bad.

Well, there IS a "bio system" in LoS1 and 2 (don't remember if MoF had one), but that's nothing we're looking for, lol.

Didn't Jorge said the "Cornelius" stuff was from a Harmony of Dissonance book-thingy or something?
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Koutei on August 07, 2014, 02:40:38 AM
Cornelius is fanon.
http://castlevania.wikia.com/wiki/Talk:Trevor_Belmont (http://castlevania.wikia.com/wiki/Talk:Trevor_Belmont)
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Jorge D. Fuentes on August 07, 2014, 12:33:03 PM
Ah yes, but I meant on the sense Jorge meant. It shows up on a character bio, but there's only two "bio systems" on X360, one in HoD (where no mention to Trevor is made) and one in SotN, where it's about Fake Trevor. I wanna know from just where came this "Cornelius".

I was talking about the character bio for Kokoro Belmont in Otomedius Excellent, you guys misunderstood what I said.

Also, I was unaware that Cornelius was fanon.  My mistake.  Will retract my message to say "Christopher" as per the Iga discussion.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Shiroi Koumori on August 09, 2014, 03:49:07 AM
Is this Kokoro's character bio?
 孤高のバンパイアハンター
 ふらりと旅に出てしまった『エモン・5』の補充要員として、秘密組織「G」が急遽招いた対魔専用戦士。
 今回の地球防衛作戦の為、聖グラディウス学園付属中学校に編入された中学一年生。
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Nagumo on August 09, 2014, 09:15:22 AM
I don't think that bio mentions Julius. Maybe it's a different one?

Supposedly, the Japanese version says she is either Julius's sister or daughter, it doesn't say exactly. It's possible the English version changed this to just sister. While this is a different series from Castlevania and whatnot, the latter would make more sense to me. The again, shouldn't Julius have amnesia in 2011? It's a bit weird.         
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: DragonSlayr81 on August 10, 2014, 10:41:04 PM

-Simon is Soleiyu's Son (dates match up)

I would say it's more likely Simon's Soleiyu's grandson. If Soleiyu was around 15 in 1591, and Simon was in his 20s 100 years later, that would mean Simon would've had to been born around 1671. That would also mean that Soleiyu would be in his 90s when Simon was conceived. At the most, he's his grandfather(if you space generations apart). If we were trying to compare it to modern times, he'd probably be Simon's great-grandfather(those who live up to that age, nowadays, are in the "great grand" title realm).

If we look at the distance between Simon(in his late 20s in 1698) and Juste(Wiki says he's 18, so around there in 1748), It's a 50 year period where Simon would be in his 70s when Juste is a teenager(which is a believable generational gap between a grandchild and grandparent). 
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Jorge D. Fuentes on August 11, 2014, 02:06:04 PM
Good call; will edit my post. My dates were not proper.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Qwertyvania on August 17, 2014, 07:59:14 PM
Why can Simon get killed by Dracula if he has already killed Death itself?
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Shiroi Koumori on August 18, 2014, 03:44:25 AM
Why can Simon get killed by Dracula if he has already killed Death itself?

Death in Castlevania, I believe, is kinda like a shinigami and not "death" itself.
This is what I got from the Ricordanza (Kabuchi no Tsuisoukyoku) novel.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: uzo on August 18, 2014, 01:12:02 PM
Alternatively you could explain it as, Death as you see him as a boss is using the extra power he has to manifest in the world like that. Once he is defeated he goes back to being just 'death' as a concept, unable to muster the energy to materialize. Just needs a little time to recharge I guess.

All conjecture, no known proof of any of that as I'm aware.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: X on August 18, 2014, 03:19:43 PM
Quote
Death in Castlevania, I believe, is kinda like a shinigami and not "death" itself.
This is what I got from the Ricordanza (Kabuchi no Tsuisoukyoku) novel.

As far as I know of Death is not a Shinigami. Those are the death gods of Japan while Castlevania had no such being in the original game. Death from CV was taken from European Christian mythology. The classic look is there; Cloak, Sythe, skeletal body. A Shimigami doesn't sport this look nor does it traditionally carry a Sythe (I did a little net-sleuthing before writing this). For me personally Death in CV is the European horseman; The Grim Reaper; Harvester of souls. He cannot die because he is the very personification of Death itself. He can be defeated but that is all that can be done to him.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Nagumo on August 18, 2014, 04:26:14 PM
This is from the manual from Legends, which I thought was interesting:

"This apparition received the great power of magic from in return for being bound to Count Dracula in an eternal master-servant blood contract. The Grim Reaper also brandishes a very sharp sickle.

This description doesn't really describe Death as "Death itself", more like an individual being. So the Legends team appears to have viewed Death as a "Shinigami" despise him having the traditional Grim Reaper look.       
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Shinobi on August 18, 2014, 04:54:36 PM
Komachi Onozuka from Touhou Project is also a shinigami, carries a scythe and also carries the souls to be judged by a yama so it is safe to say that shinigami can still be a japanese equivalent of death.
Title: Re: Castlevania Q&A
Post by: Shiroi Koumori on August 19, 2014, 02:33:58 AM
Shinigami when literally translated becomes "death gods". From what I understand from Japanese mythology, they serve as the ferry-man kinda like Charon. Death the concept is very much different from the shinigami.