Canon doesn't mean anything now that IGA has left the building, and the original timeline's been abandoned.
Two statements that you're yet to back up, I must add.
The IGA canon is pretty well established, with IGA or not. Castlevania is not IGA's, it's Konami's. And since we're speaking about rxmarcus' streaming, and since he mentioned "chronology" by which I think "IGA" or "Main Chronology" is implied, he might aswell explain that Legends and Castlevania 64 are not canon to this "main chronology". He could also be not respecting any canonicity at all (which is perfectly okay, don't rustle your jimmies, people), but this doesn't detract from the fact that there
is a "main timeline".
"blahblah Lords of Shadow"
Lords of Shadow started and ended. Self-contained reboot. Its existence doesn't mean the original timeline's erasure or abandonment.
I am by no means an expert on the timeline and don't profess to know 100% how the timeline of the games should be =) I did my best to research what I could and put them in order that appeared correct. Feel free to let me know if I have anything out of order!
Nah man, it's alright. I saw that you're also playing the loads of remakes from the original Castlevania, so it
kinda make sense to have all non-canon games there too. The thing is that when someone mentions "Chronology" over these waters, the canonicity of the games is automatically implied. When "chronology" and "Legends" appear together, the canonicity starts to be disputed, because the word "chronology" is connected to "timeline", something that Castlevania has a main one, and a separate, non canon one.