Topic: Castlevania Confessions

[crisis]

I’ll start:

I’ve never played Legacy of Darkness, I have a massive collection but this game is not in it.
and,

I’ve never finished Circle of the Moon 

[JR]

I've never legitimately beaten Dracula X and very likely never will. I'd rather play Haunted Castle over that one.

[PFG9000]

I don't really like Vampire Killer MSX.  I know years ago Morgoth Galaxius raved about how good it is, and I don't doubt him.  But I just find it boring, and the constant searching for items unengaging.

I've never beaten Dracula X SNES.  I've played up to Dracula but never beat him.  I know people say it's not as bad as it looks, but I've never given it many tries.

I feel strongly that Bloodlines suffers from having limited continues.  It's harder to learn the game with limited continues, so I've never tried.  I did beat it once, and never went back.

[JR]

I hear you on limited continues. That's the worst thing about a lot of retro games.

(Speaking of Bloodlines, I just played that last night, lol. I'm surprised I remembered the boss patterns as well as I did)

[The Puritan]

Said this before but Portrait of Ruin is better than Dawn of Sorrow, in hindsight.

Circle of the Moon's extra modes are a waste. Hugh Mode would have been so much better.

Castlevania could have done without time travel and the Morrises being unable to wield the VK naturally.

I liked The Belmont Legacy comic and was disappointed we didn't get more of it.

I would love Judgment HD with full couch and online play.

I don't think Symphony of the Night will ever be surpassed.

I would gatekeep Castlevania from post-Netflix fans but then I'd become what I hate.

[GuyStarwind]

I'm sure most of you know this, but I'm just not a fan of non Belmont characters. I've said this a hundred times that Belmonts are the heroes, and your Alucards, Somas, Shanoas, etc are supporting characters that should never outshine the heroes. I know many will say "oh but that's not true because of this or that" but that's not how I see it. To be honest this isn't just a Castlevania problem, it's an anything that says something is supposed to be the strongest yet there is something that's somehow stronger problem. Yes, I know there is story strength and gameplay strength, but they should still match. Not sure I'm making sense but yeah.

The other thing I don't care for is the Soma story. The games are very fun, but I'm sorry I'm just not into the Japanese kid becoming Dracula thing. I get these are Japanese games, but feels off from the rest of the European theme.

[BLOOD MONKEY]

The other thing I don't care for is the Soma story. The games are very fun, but I'm sorry I'm just not into the Japanese kid becoming Dracula thing. I get these are Japanese games, but feels off from the rest of the European theme.

I like to imagine, like the initial localized story implies, that he's a Latin-American weeb. Mina obviously being his long-distance discord girlfriend.

I don't think there's been a single title that's truly Castlevania in quality since Aria and Lament. I've played them all except LoS 2 and the mobile game and they're either too mediocre to be memorable or they're just nostalgia bait. Feels weird to be like that since it's almost a third of the series that exists and I know a lot of people were introduced to the games that way, but man, LoI was the last mainline game that doesn't suffer from incredibly obvious asset reuse. Somebody made that RoB skeleton sprite over 30 years ago and I don't think they made a new one until Haunted Castle Revisited. That philosophy and complacency effects the entire gamefeel top to bottom, and I don't think there has been anything produced close to the quality Castlevania had in the 90s in a long time.

I also like Simon's Quest a lot. I don't think it's fun. It's almost exclusively not fun. But I like it.