It is just an opinion, y'know; and it's my opinion that DXC isn't all that good, and that the original game dumps all over it in every conceivable way.
Well whoopdeefuckingdoo: your opinion is an unsupported pile of shit. You must be so proud.
It's funny how people can stick to a low-poly mess of a remake without even noticing how much they screwed up the gameplay in the process. DXC is just an interesting remake, but a better game it is not (cutscenes are the only actual improvement). See, low-poly, blurry-textured 3D makes sprites harder to see and collisions difficult to measure, while 2D provides clean, colorful and straightforward solutions for characters and scenario. I'm not saying 2.5D is a bad thing to do, but this particular 2.5D implementation is not exactly my favorite one (ahek ahek Bionic Commando Rearmed ahek).
I've played both games very thoroughly, and all this nonsense about collision and "screwed up gameplay" is just that: nonsense. You jump, whip, and move in a similar fashion to that of the original game. Also, 3D visuals don't have a damn thing to do with hitboxes. Blurry textures? Can't see? Then there's either something really fucking wrong with you, or you're making a mountain out of a molehill. Aside from the DEFINITE IMPROVEMENTS that I already mentioned, others include more detailed background visuals (please recall that your beloved 2D Rondo sported a bland-as-hell dungeon and clock tower). You seem so keen on condemning the 3D visuals of DXC, but I personally feel that they go a long way in fleshing out the enviroment in ways that the original didn't (another example I can bring up here being the rapids ride section).
I suppose I can understand people preferring the original game by merit of it, well, being the original game and all. However, acting as if the game's a godsend while the remake is a piece of shit strikes me as genuinely retarded.