Poll

What's your take on OoE's and HD's Treasure Chests?

I'm really missing the strategic placement of Castlevania's treasures. --The introduction of Treasure Chest randomness really cheapens the experience.
I don't mind the Random Whatever --collecting Castlevania's Treasure really isn't that important to me.
I like the Random whatever, but it's been taken too far --Castlevania needs Strategic Placement too.
I like the Random Whatever --I needed a good excuse to revisit these stages and grind my levels anyway.
I don't know.  My mind was recently violated by a Dark Priest...

Author [EN] [PL] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] [ID] Topic: The Treasures of Castlevania --Strategic Placement Vs Random Whatever  (Read 5578 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cecil-kain

  • Lord and Host
  • Master Hunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1560
  • Awards Town Crier: Updates the forum with many news items, often not even Castlevania. The Unfazed: Never loses his/her calm, even in the most heated arguments. Permanent Resident: Seems to always be around to post/reply.
    • Operation Akumajo
    • Awards
  • Favorite Game: Castlevania: The DraculaX Chronicles (PSP)
  • Likes:
Topic.

Offline Charlotte-nyo:3

  • Bloodstained is our hope
  • Vampire Hunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 257
  • Awards One-Time Show: Not quite a lurker, but posts infrequently and in only few areas.
    • Awards
  • Likes:
0
Random seems ok for HD since there's not really much overarching structure to the game--it's different from Metroidvanias/Castleroids. But for a more structured single player game I'd prefer less randomness (maybe 2 possibilities, but not tons) or the traditional set items. That is, unless they were to just go with an all-out randomly generated castle to up the replay value of a title (in which case item placement would have to be somewhat random too). Then the randomness is pretty much needed but it serves a greater purpose.

Offline Neobelmont

  • Advocate of the future
  • Master Hunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
  • Gender: Male
  • Not going to lie I love blue haired anime chicks
  • Awards Permanent Resident: Seems to always be around to post/reply. The Retro Gamer: Has a heated passion for the oldschool VG Titles. The Unfazed: Never loses his/her calm, even in the most heated arguments.
    • Awards
  • Favorite Game: Castlevania III: Dracula's Curse (NES)
  • Likes:
0
never really cared for treasure placment in cv or at least most of them.
(click to show/hide)
Come on now this was going to happen eventually  :P

Offline Foffy

  • Legendary Hunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
  • Awards One-Time Show: Not quite a lurker, but posts infrequently and in only few areas.
    • Awards
  • Favorite Game: Castlevania Bloodlines (Genesis)
  • Likes:
0
If the random whatever is needed for a quest, that's a load of bullsheeeeet. Just put it in a hard place.

Offline Ahasverus

  • Just a long slumber
  • Master Hunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 3059
  • Gender: Male
  • Wandering on horizon road
  • Awards Permanent Resident: Seems to always be around to post/reply. Town Crier: Updates the forum with many news items, often not even Castlevania. The Great Defender will always defend the object of his or her fandom.
    • Awards
  • Favorite Game: DraculaX: Rondo of Blood (PC-Engine)
  • Likes:
0
When I discovered the hidden treasures in CVI my mind was blown.
Since then, nah.

Everything comes full circle

Offline Green Stranger

  • Vampire Hunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 128
  • Gender: Male
    • Awards
  • Favorite Game: Castlevania: Symphony of the Night (PS1/SS)
  • Likes:
0
When I discovered the hidden treasures in CVI my mind was blown.
Since then, nah.

Agreed. I especially loved the sound effect. Wuuut wut wut wut wut wut or something like that.
 
As for the treasure placement in those games, it's not  huge deal to me. Castlevania shouldn't have to be all Tomb Raider-ish about treasures and such.

Offline xscientist5000

  • Hunter in Training
  • **
  • Posts: 66
  • Gender: Male
    • Awards
  • Favorite Game: Castlevania 64 (N64)
  • Likes:
0
That is, unless they were to just go with an all-out randomly generated castle to up the replay value of a title (in which case item placement would have to be somewhat random too). Then the randomness is pretty much needed but it serves a greater purpose.

A randomly generated castle reminds me of this Wii game I played "Baroque". A few cool elements but overall, worst game of my life... Not to bash your idea, I just want to point out how much I hated Baroque's attempt at it.

Offline Charlotte-nyo:3

  • Bloodstained is our hope
  • Vampire Hunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 257
  • Awards One-Time Show: Not quite a lurker, but posts infrequently and in only few areas.
    • Awards
  • Likes:
0
A lot better games than Baroque use randomly generated layouts anyway, so it isn't necessarily an indictment of randomly generated layouts. I've heard the main problem with Baroque was that it was senselessly hard and the roguelike aspect doesn't help matters any either since they're not for everyone. It probably wasn't necessarily the randomly generated nature that was the issue with it, although having not played it I can't say for certain how well the randomly generated stuff was implemented either. A lot of roguelikes tend to use randomly generated environments though, since it keeps the layouts fresh when you start over.

Offline Reinhart77

  • Courage, don't leave me now.
  • Master Hunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1890
  • Gender: Male
  • Awards The Unfazed: Never loses his/her calm, even in the most heated arguments. The Retro Gamer: Has a heated passion for the oldschool VG Titles.
    • Awards
  • Favorite Game: Castlevania: Legacy of Darkness (N64)
  • Likes:
0
i appreciate a little randomness, keeps the game from being the same every time you play it.  for the most part, the item drops fulfilled that function just fine though.  i do get a bit of gambler's high from opening treasure chests to though.

Tags: