This is on the level of Rape Dracula.
I don't understand the attempts to manufacture controversy over that at all. I mean, of course Dracula is a rapist, he has been since Bram Stoker. That's what makes him so disturbing. He takes people against their will and forces them to exchange fluids in a metaphor that is as brutal and violent as it is blatantly sexual. It's really sad if all of the modern romanticized portrayals make people surprised by one of the central aspects of what
should be a repulsive character. I mean hello Dracula is a serial killer who has operated for hundreds of years. He's bound to have killed thousands of innocent victims including the children we see him sneeringly feed to his brides, a sensitive misunderstood soul he ain't.
Granted these more unpleasant aspects haven't been examined much in the original cartoony and arcade-y Castlevania canon. But these are the kind of horrible character traits that
should be explored for "gritty reboots", otherwise why do a "gritty" reboot at all? Particularly
if you're playing as said horrible person. There's no point in having such a person be your protagonist if you're going to hide the extent of their horridness from the audience even during the ending of the story.
That would be a good thought, but I believe that SotN came out before legends. So, it can't have anything to do with Sonia.
It came out before Legends but they both came out in 97, so it's not unthinkable that Legends was in the planning stages while they were making SotN.
As for the OP. That's very interesting question but I think it's likely another case of a cigar being a cigar and a coffin being a coffin.