And why does Chronicles supersede SCV4?
Belmontoya, get off your high horse for a moment.
First I was referring to Chronology, meaning Chronicles supersedes SCVIV
in the timelinePeople can try to debate it all they want for fun, but come on..
Come on what? No one is debating anything.
Chronicles is not even close to as good of a game as SCV4.
Then I'd be the first person to tell you it is. Your opinion is your opinion, the community of Castlevania fans in general probably do prefer SCVIV, but what difference should this make to the minority who don't..?
Chronicles has absolutely no business superseding SCV4. The very idea infuriates me.
You sound a lot like a butthurt fanboy trying to defend something which you're afraid people will think is bad. I'm not surprised at you admitting to your fury.
No sprites from the world of Chronicles appear in SOTN. Yet, SCV4 characters are present.
So fucking what? So many CV games take sprites from other CV games. That's a weak argument.
To take assets from SCV4, yet claim a painfully inferior game as the official cannon version of Simon's famous adventure is down right insulting.
First of all, it is canon. There's an interview by Iga on the PSX disc stating it's a retelling of the original CV story.
Secondly, the official Iga timeline that came with POR shows Simon's CV Chronicles Arrange artwork, yet SCVIV is nowehere to be found, not as a retelling of CV1 nor as a sequel to Simon's Quest.
http://nichegamer.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/timeline-side2.jpgFinally, it's insulting to you, but get out of your own ego for a minute. People like games, people like SCVIV, but nobody cares if you like it aside from you. Your response is utter nonsense. You just love something so much you want it to be canon.