@Kazudra Nintendo fanboys are worse than Zelda imo. Even going to the extreme of defending shitty consoles.
Although I am a longtime hardcore Nintendo and Zelda fan, I don't consider myself a fanboy because I also admit that certain games and aspects of certain games are genuinely lacking.
I loved OOT but never got into MM, WW was insanely popular at the time and I hated it, I loved TP while everyone was screaming WW. (Upon playing TP the second time I saw how unnecessary the intro/ tutorials of the game were.) I believe MC as good maybe even better than ALTTP, and that ALBW>ALTTP in content but not story. The only time I've been annoyed at a reviewer's opinion was Gamespot giving SS 7.5/ 10. Not because of the score but because it slammed SS for doing things that were done much better than in previous Zelda's, and the review did not acknowledge how well the game was designed given it's control scheme and the re-use of environments, which it did very well imo as opposed to say WW which re-used certain environments without innovation. I do, however, admit I am biased towards SS as it is my favourite Zelda game.
The biggest downfall about Zelda fanboys (specifically) imo is the Zelda Cycle. Although there are other franchises with more hardcore fanboys imho. For example Purist FF fanboys who don't like any games after VI. (Fanboys only and not pointing fingers at anyone here).
At the end of the day I like certain games because I like them, some games are crap but I may like certain crap games too. Castlevania COD is a classic example. It's not a fantastic game but it evokes the Castlevania within me and I like that. I even like it better than SCVIV which I don't think is great for a Castlevania game, even though I know that technically on all fronts it is a fantastic game.
I don't find that the Zelda WW, the Oracle series or LA are particularly good games for Zelda. I admit when not liking something regardless of its title.