About the now infamous "83 score" here's something actually very interesting some GameFaqs user pointed out:
You can't seriously be that new to how reviews work and how every publication wants to be the first on the shelves with the hottest news. There was a reivew out for Shattered Dimensions a week and a half before the game was to hit the shelves and it was pulled off the website where it was being hosted due to Activision complaining. That was also a US site, and this magazine is in Germany. If the game went gold a week ago, that would give the reviewer two days of non stop playing to get a good handle on the game, then another day to write up an article and have it printed, then another day or two for shipping. It's entirely possible.

So, a rushed review after all? It seems logic to me.. they played safe. 83 is a safe bet for a GOOD game before the "big ones" start releasing their scores, and, as always, what Ign/GS etc gives to the game, the other 80% of the internet will. So, this german magazine just made a safe bet with the review score like saying "This is the lower score it could have so we won't be far of the average and will look cool being the first ones".
And of course, how did a german magazine get the code like... 1 day before printing and having a full complete review? I don't think so...