i actually think the game informer review is written worse than the gamespot review. the gamespot review at least explains its points a bit further. it's a overall a bit too negative and there are a few generalizations about the fans, yeah, but then the gi review seems afraid to point out flaws. it does list some, but it quickly skips over them. strikes me as a bit odd.
"Konami finally produces an awesome 3D Castlevania by ripping off awesome games and infusing its signature style" - gameinformer, i am not sure how this is even a positive comment, if not for the signature style part.
but hey, it looks like the combat is pretty solid, even though they probably liked god of war so i shouldn't trust them! the exploration aspect while just being a bonus is looking to be pretty expansive. i can swing with that. everyone is complimenting the graphics, but i actually am a bit irked by the graphic engine in some cases, lighting and etc.
but seriously why are they all "heh, no old castlevania tunes here," the last few castlevania soundtracks have mostly original compositions. what.
NUMBERED SCORES, GOTTA LOVE THEM.