Pretty much. IGN ripped horribly on God Hand, and a Gamestop employee recommended I not buy Earth Defense Force because of negative reviews. I got both of 'em anyway and loved the hell out of them. Similar stuff happened with Legacy of Darkness and God knows what else.
Occasionally reviews are spot on. I ignored Game Informer's scathing review of Mega Man X7 because they hate on pretty much all Mega Man games for being too samey anyway, but booooy did I regret that. What an atrocious game. I guess the moral is that you can only really trust yourself.
100% agreed: I end up forgoing reviews and just giving the game a shot if it interest me. The only bad thing is that some gamers tend to be 'sheep' and if this game (Which hasn't been promoted that well, seriously, no T.V. bump Konami?) gets pretty negative scores, people may pass it up instead of thinking and trying from themselves.
I remember Transformers : War for Cyberton, IGN gave it a good score, and actually gave it
two reviews! I've been frequenting IGN for a couple of years and they never did that to even the most legendary of games, they actually brought a number if not all editors or reviewers for IGN and each said how much this game is worth it; I think they know that people tend to avoid these games after a number of failures like Ironman and the previous Transformers. so then I said this has to be good for them to go through all the trouble of making two reviews for a single game and I got it...and guess what? it SUCKED! I wasted my money, I read Gamespot review later and it was more realistic about the game.
call me paranoid but sometimes I think big sites like IGN get bribed, and we fall for it. never again am I going to be a "sheep".