OK, long post;
I don't understand why people say LoS is "not Castlevania"? What exactly are they talking about? What do they know that I don't? The developers already said they're keeping the stuff they like and leaving other things out. Nobody knows what this means, yet people are already writing this game off as "not Castlevania enough". For all we know, LoS may be OMG SUPER FAITHFUL to the original Castlevania concept. More so than any of the IGAvanias before it.
People seem to think that Mercurysteam will throw everything out the window and create a game that has nothing whatsoever to do with the series. Now, what developer would be so retarded? For what reason would they remove the stuff that the very foundation of Castlevania is built upon? It's like if Flagship Studios had put Mickey Mouse in The Minish Cap instead of Link. I mean, why would they? If I was a developer with the Castlevania licence in my hands, I would put Dracula in it immediately. Who wouldn't? The only person who'd deliberately leave Dracula AND Belmonts out of a CV is - wait for it - IGA!
LoS will more than likely have a Belmont, Dracula, remixed music from the series and everything else. If Mercurysteam decides to ignore the pretentious crap that's been going on in the storyline since IGA took over, and go back to what CV is really about, i'm all for it!
